The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sandstone vs. carbonate petroleum reservoirs: A global perspective on porosity-depth and porosity-permeability relationships
Abstract
Abstract Plots are presented comparing average porosity vs. depth for 30,122 siliciclastic petroleum reservoirs and 10,481 carbonate petroleum reservoirs covering all petroleum-producing countries except Canada. However, separate plots cover 5534 siliciclastic and 2830 carbonate reservoirs of the Alberta basin in Canada. Average permeability vs. average porosity is shown for the non-Canadian reservoirs. Key similarities and differences between sandstones and carbonates are noted, and implications are discussed regarding the dominant factors controlling reservoir quality in each lithology. Trends of steadily decreasing median and maximum porosity with increasing depth reflect burial diagenetic porosity loss in response to increasing thermal exposure with depth. These trends seem inconsistent with the suggestions that both sandstones and carbonates commonly increase in porosity by dissolution during deeper burial. Carbonate reservoirs have lower values of median and maximum porosity for a given burial depth, probably because of greater chemical reactivity of carbonate minerals relative to quartz and the resulting lower resistance to chemical compaction and associated cementation. Relative paucity of low-porosity (0–8%) siliciclastic reservoirs at all depths compared with carbonates may reflect the more common occurrence of fractures in carbonates and the effectiveness of these fractures for facilitating economic flow rates in low-porosity rock. Overall, carbonate reservoirs do not have lower permeability for a given porosity compared with sandstones but do have strikingly lower proportions of both high-porosity and high-permeability values. The data presented can serve as a general guide for the distribution of reservoir quality that can reasonably be expected in exploration wells drilled to any given depth in the absence of detailed geologic information, such as burial and thermal history.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Classification of Carbonate Rocks According to Depositional Textures
Dunham, R. J. (1962) · Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) · Cited by 3,108
Tucker, M. E., & Wright, V. P. (1990) · doi:10.1002/9781444314175 · Cited by 2,789
Geologic Nomenclature and Classification of Porosity in Sedimentary Carbonates
Philip W. Choquette (2), L. C. P. (1970) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/5d25c98b-16c1-11d7-8645000102c1865d · Cited by 1,694
Blatt, H. (1973) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-197305000-00019 · Cited by 1,074
Diagenesis of Gulf Coast Clayey Sediments and Its Possible Relation to Petroleum Migration
(2), J. F. B. (1969) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/5d25c595-16c1-11d7-8645000102c1865d · Cited by 584
Organic-Inorganic Interactions and Sandstone Diagenesis
Ronald, C. S., Crossey, L. J., Hagen, E. S., & Heasler, H. P. (1989) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/703c9ad7-1707-11d7-8645000102c1865d · Cited by 465
Carbonate Porosity Versus Depth: A Predictable Relation for South Florida
James W. Schmoker, R. B. H. (1982) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/03b5ac73-16d1-11d7-8645000102c1865d · Cited by 402
Carbonate reservoir characterization
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-6300 · Cited by 401
Carbonate Reservoir Characterization
Lucia, F. J. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03985-4 · Cited by 360
Kinetic Modeling of Quartz Cementation and Porosity Loss in Deeply Buried Sandstone Reservoirs
(2), O. W. (1996) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/64ed88a4-1724-11d7-8645000102c1865d · Cited by 342
Cited by
The global volume and distribution of modern groundwater
Gleeson, T., Befus, K. M., Jasechko, S., Luijendijk, E., & Cardenas, M. B. (2016) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2590 · Cited by 772
On the delimitation of the carbonate burial realm
Immenhauser, A. (2022) · The Depositional Record · doi:10.1002/dep2.173 · Cited by 95
Regional porosity variation in Thamama-B reservoirs of Abu Dhabi
Ehrenberg, S. N., Zhang, J., & Gomes, J. S. (2020) · Marine and Petroleum Geology · doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104245 · Cited by 18
Self-citationMoore, C. H., & Wade, W. J. (2013) · Developments in Sedimentology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53831-4.00010-0 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Ehrenberg, S. N., & Nadeau, P. H.
- Venue
- AAPG Bulletin
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-445
- ISSN
- 0149-1423 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141657015
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sandstone vs. carbonate petroleum reservoirs: A global perspective on porosity-depth and porosity-permeability relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1306/11230404071
- The paper
- Ehrenberg, S. N., & Nadeau, P. H. (2005). Sandstone vs. carbonate petroleum reservoirs: A global perspective on porosity-depth and porosity-permeability relationships. AAPG Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1306/11230404071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.