Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 569

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Carbonate Platform Facies Models

J. Fred Read (2)·1985·AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

ABSTRACT Various types of carbonate platforms are characterized by distinctive profiles, facies, and evolutionary sequences. Ramps may be homoclinal or distally steepened, and may have fringing or barrier shoal-water complexes of ooid-pellet sands or skeletal banks. Homoclinal ramps pass seaward into deeper water without major break in slope, and lack deep-water breccias. Distally steepened ramps may below energy, and characterized by widespread, shallow, subwave-base mud blankets, or high energy with coastal beach/dune complexes and widespread skeletal sand blankets. Slope facies may contain abundant breccias of slope-derived clasts. Rimmed shelves have relatively flat tops, and marked break in slopes at the high energy, shallow-shelf edge where they pass into deep water. Such shelves may be aggraded with peritidal facies extending over much of the shelf, or incipiently drowned, depending on magnitude of sea level fluctuations. They may be accretionary, or bypass types that include gullied slope, escarpment, and high-relief erosional forms. Intrashelf basins occur on some shelves, controlling distribution of reservoir and source beds. Isolated platforms are surrounded by deeper water and may be located on rifted continental margins, or on submarine volcanoes. Most have high-relief rimmed margins. Platforms that have been subjected to rapid sea level rise may be incipiently drowned, and characterized by raised rims, elevated patch or pinnacle reefs, and widespread subwave-base carbonate or fine clastic blankets. Completely drowned shelves develop where the shelf is submerged to subphotic depths, terminating shallow water deposition, and commonly resulting in blanketing of the shelf by deeper water facies. Some margins show extensive down-to-basin faulting that is contemporaneous with carbonate deposition, or associated with thick prograding clastic sequences. The various types of platforms change in response to variations in sedimentation, subsidence or sea level rise, and may form distinctive evolutionary sequences. The relatively few models presented appear to accommodate most geological examples, some of which contain major reservoir facies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1306/ad461b79-16f7-11d7-8645000102c1865d

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 569

Metadata

Authors
(2), J. F. R.
Venue
AAPG Bulletin
Published
1985
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
1-21
ISSN
0149-1423 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4214634148
Cited by
569
References
0
FWCI
25.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbonate Platform Facies Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1306/ad461b79-16f7-11d7-8645000102c1865d
The paper
(2), J. F. R. (1985). Carbonate Platform Facies Models. AAPG Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1306/ad461b79-16f7-11d7-8645000102c1865d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.