The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fan Valleys, Channels, and Depositional Lobes on Modern Submarine Fans: Characters for Recognition of Sandy Turbidite Environments
Abstract
Abstract The growth-pattern concept for modern submarine fans has been reviewed and broadened by additional data published or obtained in the last five years. The similarities in morphology, structure, and surficial-sedimentation patterns among modern fans from different geographic and geologic settings support a general growth-pattern model that can be applied to ancient turbidite deposits. Most submarine fans have three recognizable morphologic divisions that are related to distinct facies associations for sandy and coarser turbidites. (1) The large-leveed valley(s) of the upper fan produce wide (1 to 5 km) valley-floor deposits that are the coarsest on the fan and are deposited in meandering or braided, shallow channels within the general confines of the valley. These coarse deposits grade laterally into finer grained and more regularly bedded levee sands and silts. (2) The middle-fan region is recognized as a convex-upward depositional bulge on a radial profile and includes a depositional lobe or suprafan at the terminus of the leveed valley. The coarsening- and thickening-upward sequence of sandy turbidites on the upper suprafan are cut by numerous channels, channel remnants, and isolated depressions, whereas the lower suprafan is relatively free of such features. Suprafan channels are generally less than 1 km across and probably are filled by thinning-and fining-upward sequences. (3) The lower fan division is characteristically free of channel features (and coarse turbidites), is nearly flat-wing or ponded, and, therefore, is indistinguishable morphologically from basin-plain or abyssal-plain settings in many cases. Basin shape and relief and the ultimate size of the fan appear less important than sediment-input parameters, such as the grain-size distribution and rate of sediment supply, in controlling development of the three morphologic divisions of the fan. Specifically, canyon-fed systems common along western North America tend to have a single-leveed valley terminating in a suprafan depositional lobe; some fans, such as the Monterey, have slightly more complex features where more than one canyon is involved in fan development. If the grain-size distribution is weighted toward the silt and clay fractions as in some delta-fed systems, the fans tend to have multiple-leveed valleys on the upper fan (although only one may be active at any given time), to have long valleys crossing much of the fan, and to lack (or have poorly developed) suprafan relief.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shanmugam, G. (2000) · Marine and Petroleum Geology · doi:10.1016/s0264-8172(99)00011-2 · Cited by 531
Kane, I. A., & Clare, M. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Earth Science · doi:10.3389/feart.2019.00080 · Cited by 476
PRÉLAT, A., HODGSON, D. M., & FLINT, S. S. (2009) · Sedimentology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3091.2009.01073.x · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- (2), W. R. N.
- Venue
- AAPG Bulletin
- Published
- 1978
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 912-931
- ISSN
- 0149-1423 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989132023
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fan Valleys, Channels, and Depositional Lobes on Modern Submarine Fans: Characters for Recognition of Sandy Turbidite Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1306/c1ea4f72-16c9-11d7-8645000102c1865d
- The paper
- (2), W. R. N. (1978). Fan Valleys, Channels, and Depositional Lobes on Modern Submarine Fans: Characters for Recognition of Sandy Turbidite Environments. AAPG Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1306/c1ea4f72-16c9-11d7-8645000102c1865d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.