CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 11Youth Education and Societal DynamicsCultural Capital and Social ClassGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Individualisation of Responsibility and School Achievement

Open access
Mencin Čeplak, Metka·2012·Czech Sociological Review
DOI 10.13060/00380288.2012.48.6.04
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Education is seen as an investment in 'human capital', and providing children with a good education is considered to be key to securing their future and their success in life. This article analyses how these discourses on education affect young people in the context of the dismantling of public services and growing social uncertainty. Surveys on youth in Slovenia in the late 1990s and 2000s indicate that children are exposed to the pressure of academic success very early in their lives. The article examines the symbolic meaning of academic achievement, the importance of school success in the educational path in post-socialist Slovenia, and its influence on teenagers' self-understanding and identity construction. The analysis is based on short narratives written by secondary school students about their experiences with school (under-)achievement. The wider social context is clarified based on some research and statistical data. The analysis leads to the conclusion that striving for school success is a response to the neoliberal process of individualising responsibility, which is also reflected in 'truths' about the importance of early child care for later academic achievement-these 'truths' can be understood as normalising discourses, which have an important influence on the construction of the self and the parent-child relationship.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13060/00380288.2012.48.6.04

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. Althusser, 1980, Ideologija
  2. Apple, 1996, Cultural Politics and Education
  3. Apple, 2001, Educating the 'Right' Way: Markets, Standards, God, and Inequality
  4. 10.1177/0895904803260022 · DOI
  5. Aronowitz, 1993, Education Still under Siege
  6. Backe-Hansen, 2002, Young People between Home and School
  7. Ball, 1994, Market Forces and Parental Choice
  8. 10.1007/s10734-004-1449-1 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/0142569970180203 · DOI
  10. Dale, 1997, The State and the Governance of Education: An Analysis of the Restructuring of the State-Education Relationship
  11. 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.00049.x · DOI
  12. 10.1080/713655358 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/17449642.2011.622982 · DOI
  14. Ericsson, 2002, Adults as Resources and Adults as Burdens. The Strategies of Children
  15. Fine, 1990, Making Controversy: Who's at Risk?' Journal of Urban and, Cultural Studies, 1, 55
  16. Fine, 1994, Working the Hyphens: Reinventing Self and Other
  17. Foucault, 1984, Nadzorovanje in kaznovanje: Rojstvo zapora
  18. Foucault, 2000, Volja do znanja: Zgodovina sesksualnosti, Vol.1. (The Will to Knowledge: The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1)
  19. Foucault, 2008, The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978-1979
  20. Gillborn, 2000, Rationing Education: Policy, Practice, Reform and Equity
  21. Goffman, 1976, Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity
  22. Gould, 1981, The Mismeasure of Man
  23. 10.1080/0022027032000167080 · DOI
  24. 10.4324/9780203997895 · DOI
  25. Henriques, 1984, Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity
  26. Hill, 2003, Global Neo-Liberalism, the Deformation of Education and Resistance.' Journal for Critical Education, Policy Studies, 1, 1
  27. 10.1080/09502380210128315 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/00131910903469544 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/0011392110368003 · DOI
  30. 10.13060/00380288.2010.46.5.04 · DOI
  31. 10.2478/v10159-011-0007-z · DOI
  32. Kvale, 1981, Izpiti in gospostvo
  33. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.001 · DOI
  34. Lareau, 2003, Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life
  35. Lasch, 1991, The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectation
  36. Laval, 2005, School Is Not a Company: Neoliberal Attack on Public Education
  37. Lavrič, 2010, Mladina 2010. (Youth 2010) Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport, Urad RS za mladino
  38. 10.20419/2007.16.228 · DOI
  39. McLaren, 1993, Schooling as a Ritual Performance
  40. Mencin Čeplak, 2002, Šola, služba
  41. Mencin Čeplak, 2006, Geneza šolske (ne)uspešnosti. Neobjavljeno raziskovalno poročilo.' (The Genesis of School Success (Failure)) Unpublished research report. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede, Inštitut za družbene vede, Center za socialno psihologijo
  42. Miheljak, 2000, Mladina 2000. (Youth 2000) Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo, znanost in šport, Urad republike Slovenije za mladino
  43. Montandon, 2002, Home and School Constraints
  44. Muršak, 2010, General Education in the Function of Labour Market Needs and/or Personal Development and the Notion of Literacy, Odgojne znanosti, 12, 185
  45. Peček Čuk, 2006, Pravičnost slovenske šole: mit ali realnost?
  46. 10.2478/v10159-011-0008-y · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1741-5446.1997.00287.x · DOI
  48. 10.1080/0142569022000015472 · DOI
  49. Rose, 1990, Governing the Soul
  50. 10.1017/CBO9780511488856 · DOI
  51. Skelton, 2003, Introduction. Boys and Girls
  52. Statistical Office, 2004, Statistical Information 9. Ljubljana: Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia
  53. Statistical Office, 2006, Statistical Information 19. Ljubljana: Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia
  54. Statistical Office, 2007, Statistical Yearbook. Ljubljana: Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia
  55. Statistical Office, 2008, Statistical Information 28. Ljubljana: Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia
  56. Šteh, 2008, Učitelji in starši v očeh drug drugega pri "medsebojnem sodelovanju, (Teachers and Parents and Their Cooperation in Each Other's Eyes) Sodobna pedagogika, 59, 30
  57. Tomori, 2002, Šolska neuspešnost kot dejavnik tveganja za celostni osebnostni razvoj.' (School Failure as a Risk Factor on Holistic Personality Development) Pp. 16-18
  58. Toš, 2004, Vrednote v prehodu III. Slovensko javno mnenje 1999/2004. (Values in Transition III
  59. Toš, 2009, Vrednote v prehodu IV. Slovensko javno mnenje 2004/2009. (Values in Transition IV
  60. Ule, 2000, Socialna ranljivost mladih. (Social Vulnerability of Young People) Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo in š
  61. 10.1080/0141192970230308 · DOI
  62. Walkeridne, 1984, Developmental Psychology and the Child-Centred Pedagogy: The Insertion of Piaget into Early Education
  63. 10.1080/01596300701289409 · DOI
  64. Webb, 2009, Preparing Teachers for the Neoliberal Panopticon, Educational Foundations, 23, 3
  65. Whitty, 1993, Specialization and Choice in Urban Education

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mencin Čeplak, M.
Venue
Czech Sociological Review
Publisher
Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-12-01
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
1093-1114
ISSN
  • 0038-0288 (ISSN-L)
  • 2336-128X
DOI
10.13060/00380288.2012.48.6.04
OpenAlex
W154902666
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Czech Sociological Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Capital and Social Class
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Keywords
academic performance, neoliberalism, youth identity formation, self-understanding, post-communist transition, Slovenia, early childhood care, parent-child relationship, human capital, educational inequality, social uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review