The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical Laboratory Tests: Which, Why, and What Do The Results Mean?
Open accessAbstract
According to Dr. Michael Laposata, the medical specialty that nearly every practicing physician relies on every day, for which training in many medical schools is limited to no more than a scattered few lectures throughout the entire curriculum, is “laboratory medicine.” The importance of understanding the principles for selecting and ordering the most rational laboratory test(s) on a specific patient is heightened in the current age of managed care, medical necessity, and outcome-oriented medicine. The days of a “shotgun approach” to ordering laboratory tests has, of necessity, been replaced by a “rifle” (or targeted) approach based on an understanding of the test’s diagnostic performance and the major “legitimate” reasons for ordering a laboratory test. Such an understanding is critical to good laboratory practice and patient outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Elevated interleukin‐6 and severe COVID‐19: A meta‐analysis
Aziz, M., Fatima, R., & Assaly, R. (2020) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.25948 · Cited by 554
Permanent vs Transient Congenital Hypothyroidism: Assessment of Predictive Variables
Oron, T., Lazar, L., Ben-Yishai, S., Tenenbaum, A., Yackobovitch-Gavan, M., Meyerovitch, J., Phillip, M., & Lebenthal, Y. (2018) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2018-00362 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Wians, F. H.
- Venue
- Laboratory Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-01-21
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-113
- ISSN
- 0007-5027 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162786929
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Laboratory Tests: Which, Why, and What Do The Results Mean? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1309/lm404l0hhutwwudd
- The paper
- Wians, F. H. (2009). Clinical Laboratory Tests: Which, Why, and What Do The Results Mean? Laboratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1309/lm404l0hhutwwudd
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.