Cited by 25Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsPharmacy and Medical PracticesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Electronic inventory systems and barcode technology: impact on pharmacy technical accuracy and error liability.

Oldland, Alan R., Golightly, Larry K., May, Sondra K., Barber, Gerard R., Stolpman, Nancy M.·2015·Hospital Pharmacy

Abstract

Purpose: To measure the effects associated with sequential implementation of electronic medication storage and inventory systems and product verification devices on pharmacy technical accuracy and rates of potential medication dispensing errors in an academic medical center. Methods: During four 28-day periods of observation, pharmacists recorded all technical errors identified at the final visual check of pharmaceuticals prior to dispensing. Technical filling errors involving deviations from order-specific selection of product, dosage form, strength, or quantity were documented when dispensing medications using (a) a conventional unit dose (UD) drug distribution system, (b) an electronic storage and inventory system utilizing automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) within the pharmacy, (c) ADCs combined with barcode (BC) verification, and (d) ADCs and BC verification utilized with changes in product labeling and individualized personnel training in systems application. Results: Using a conventional UD system, the overall incidence of technical error was 0.157% (24/15,271). Following implementation of ADCs, the comparative overall incidence of technical error was 0.135% (10/7,379; P = .841). Following implementation of BC scanning, the comparative overall incidence of technical error was 0.137% (27/19,708; P = .729). Subsequent changes in product labeling and intensified staff training in the use of BC systems was associated with a decrease in the rate of technical error to 0.050% (13/26,200; P = .002). Conclusions: Pharmacy ADCs and BC systems provide complementary effects that improve technical accuracy and reduce the incidence of potential medication dispensing errors if this technology is used with comprehensive personnel training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1310/hpj5001-34

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oldland, A. R., Golightly, L. K., May, S. K., Barber, G. R., & Stolpman, N. M.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Golightly, Larry K.
Venue
Hospital Pharmacy
Published
2015-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
034-041
ISSN
  • 0018-5787 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-1253
OpenAlex
W4252361637
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Hospital Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
barcode technology, medication dispensing errors, automated dispensing cabinets, unit dose drug distribution, product verification, product labeling, employee training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review