The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Cognitive, Emotional, and Social Sequelae of Stroke: Psychological and Ethical Concerns in Post-Stroke Adaptation
Abstract
In the clinical domain, ethical analyses involve examination of complex individual responses, psychological processes, and social context. Psychological aspects of stroke adaptation include the risk for depression and anxiety, changes in identity and personality processes, and potential for social isolation. Depression and anxiety are heterogeneous constructs and can affect individuals' emotional functioning and cognitive abilities. Executive function, self-agency, and volition may be affected. Alterations in identity and personality may also result from the interaction of fluctuating emotional, cognitive, and physical abilities as well as from changes in social context and family dynamics. Social isolation, or lack of access to social contact or resources, can be a consequence of difficulties in cognitive and emotional function that influence interpersonal relationships, changes in social roles, communication difficulties, and challenges in transportation and employment. Social stigma and marginalization also contribute to isolation. The authors describe these psychological phenomena in the context of brain damage and recovery and raise ethical concerns including impact on decision-making capacity, pre- and postinjury selves and interests, and the social milieu in which strokes are experienced.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The cognitive, physical, social and emotional consequences of stroke can have widespread implications for a person's functioning (Littooji, Dekker, Vloothuis, Legt, & Widdershoven, 2016;Mukherjee, Levin, & Heller, 2006).”
From “Giving yourself some breathing room…”: an exploration of group meditation for people with aphasia (2021) · cites this paper as Mukherjee, Levin, & Heller, 2006
Citations
Cites
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,848
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.
Carter, M. J. (2014) · Therapeutic Recreation Journal · Cited by 15,154
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
(2012) · Thieves of Virtue · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9079.003.0009 · Cited by 13,453
From dissertation abstracts international
(1974) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/988616.988619 · Cited by 12,208
Parfit, D. (1986) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/019824908x.001.0001 · Cited by 5,803
Principles of biomedical ethics
Horton, J. (2002) · Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.1016/s0035-9203(02)90265-8 · Cited by 4,408
A Controlled Trial to Improve Care for Seriously III Hospitalized Patients
Connors, A. F. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.274.20.1591 · Cited by 3,448
Neuropsychological assessment, 4th ed.
Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Loring, D. W., Hannay, H. J., & Fischer, J. S. (2004) · Cited by 1,934
Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control.
Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (2002) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.111.2.225 · Cited by 1,729
Comorbidity of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders
Mineka, S., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.377 · Cited by 1,573
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 2002, Self-Determination Framework for People with Psychiatric Disabilities
- Heller W, 1997, Cognition Emotion, 11, 638
- Levin RL, Cognit Ther Res
- Banich MT, 1992, I Neuropsychol Neuropsychiatry Behav Neurol, 5, 20
- Grace J, 2002, Frontal Systems Behavior ScaleTM
- Roth RM, 2005, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A). Odessa
- Heller W, 2003, Brain Inj Source, 6, 30
- Stewart JE, 2000, Dissertation Abstracts International, 63, 5538
- Heller W, I Rehabil
- Gordon RM, 1999, Treatment Resource, 45
- 10.1037/0090-5550.46.1.82 · DOI
- Magasi S, 2004, Dis Studies Q, 24
- 10.1001/jama.1995.03530200027032 · DOI
- Parfit D, 1984, Reasons and Persons
- Gerhart KA, 1994, Ann Intern Med, 23, 807
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–126 of 126
Testing a Psychological Tool to Enhance Hope in People With Stroke; a Qualitative StudyPreprint
Soundy, A., Forkner, A., Bresloff, A., Palser, H., Bamford, T., Mrowiec, D., Reed, A., & Chan, C. (2023) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202310.1319.v2 · Cited by 1
Repair-Based Therapies After Stroke
Cramer, S. C. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9530-8_39
Psychodynamic Factors of Recovery After Brain Injury: A Role for Defence Mechanisms?
da Costa, A. L. C., Gullo, S., & Caltagirone, C. (2017) · Contemporary clinical neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52067-4_15
Dibbanti, H. R. (2018)
Stroke Survivors: Needs, Wellness and Warning Signs in a Stroke Support Group Population
Nagar, S., & Ashaye, T. (2018) · Journal of Neurology and Experimental Neuroscience · doi:10.17756/jnen.2018-043
Predicting Stroke Risk in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using Machine LearningPreprint
Jung, S., Lee, E.-J., Lee, M., Bae, S., Kim, Y.-Y., Lee, D., Song, M., & Yoo, S. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-209356/v1
Jones, S. H. (2014) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-622-6_3
Garrick, J., & Buck, M. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19055-1_5
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Ischemic Stroke Distress Scale (ISDS)
Kang, J., & Yoo, Y. (2023) · Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · doi:10.4040/jkan.22090
Psychological Aspects of Recovery After Brain Injury: A Focus on Psychodynamic Factors
da Costa, A. L. C., Gullo, S., Bivona, U., & Caltagirone, C. (2023) · Contemporary clinical neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24930-3_17
Holistic Approach In Stroke Patients: A Clinical Trial
Kaya, A., & Atayoğlu, A. T. (2023) · Medical Science and Discovery · doi:10.36472/msd.v10i10.1064
Jefferson, L. J., & Dunne, S. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/pfvx9
Mieux évaluer, mieux soigner : le Quetci, un questionnaire d’évaluation des troubles cognitifs IDE
Porebski, V., Bara, L., Maillet, D., Belin, C., & Carpentier, A. (2024) · La Revue de l Infirmière · doi:10.1016/j.revinf.2024.03.014
Lee, D. C., EMBLIN, K., DANIELS, R., Kallis, T. J., ALALLAN, M., & Mokbel, K. (2024) · In Vivo · doi:10.21873/invivo.13861 · Cited by 1
Affective Computing in Serious Games for Physical Rehabilitation: Scoping Review
Beristain-Colorado, M. D. P., Batres-Mendoza, P., Guerra-Hernandez, E. I., Cano-Pérez, J. L., Perezcampos-Mayoral, C., Vargas-Treviño, M., Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, J., & Ambros-Antemate, J. F. (2026) · JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies · doi:10.2196/81344
Ökten, Ç., & Takil, M. (2025) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2025.2541881
Older Stroke Survivors in Home Care: Factors Associated with the use of CCAC Rehabilitation Services
Bucek, J. (2015) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo)
Azé, O. D. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/98a87fe7z5da1z4bb9z92d3zb9dadc93cffe
Degrees of Separation: Grandchildren's Experiences of Grandparental Brain Tumor or Stroke
Sapsford, E., Norman, A., Jackson, S., Deacon, J., Ravenhill, E., & Keohane, P. (2026) · The Family Journal · doi:10.1177/10664807261438060
Sosyal Görünüş Kaygısı Ölçeği’nin İnmeli Hastalarda Geçerlik Ve Güvenilirliği
Çataltaş, B. A., & Akman, T. C. (2026) · Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal · doi:10.52538/iduhes.1782300
Virovec, M., Massironi, G., Refatti, N., Crimi, G., Galbusera, M., Rimondini, M., Savazzi, S., Donisi, V., & Cesari, P. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1872042
Patient-centric approaches: Shared decision-making in stroke management
Athawale, S., Athawale, S. S., Thakur, V. K., & Rangnekar, R. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-44895-9.00016-0
Issues in Clinical Trial Design in Stem Cell Trials After Stroke
Cramer, S. C. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15063-5_18
Metadata
- Authors
- Mukherjee, D., Levin, R. L., & Heller, W.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 26-35
- ISSN
- 1074-9357 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-5119
- OpenAlex
- W2060791700
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- stroke, depression, anxiety, executive function, self-agency, volition, personal transformation, personality change, social isolation, social stigma, marginalization, decision-making capacity, family dynamics, ethical considerations, psychological sequelae
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Personality, Social Isolation, Mental Competency, Stroke, Ethics, Clinical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review