Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and heart disease: A systematic review
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The analysis did not investigate differences in effect sizes for SHS exposure at home versus at work.
“Previous studies have found different effect sizes for SHS exposure at home and at work442,443,462, a factor that was not investigated in our analysis.”
From Health effects associated with exposure to secondhand smoke: a Burden of Proof study (2024) · cites this paper as [443]
Cites
Passive smoking and the risk of coronary heart disease—a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies
He, J., Vupputuri, S., Allen, K., Prerost, M. R., Hughes, J., & Whelton, P. K. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199903253401204 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
Cardiovascular Effect of Bans on Smoking in Public Places
Meyers, D. G., Neuberger, J. S., & He, J. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.022 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Health effects associated with exposure to secondhand smoke: a Burden of Proof study
Flor, L. S., Anderson, J. A., Ahmad, N., Aravkin, A., Carr, S., Dai, X., Gil, G. F., Hay, S. I., Malloy, M. J., McLaughlin, S. A., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02743-4 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
“Previous studies have found different effect sizes for SHS exposure at home and at work 442,443,462 , a factor that was not investigated in our analysis.”
Background
- Authors
- Lee, P. N., Forey, B. A., Hamling, J. S., & Thornton, A. J.
- Venue
- World Journal of Meta-Analysis
- Publisher
- Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 14
- ISSN
- 2308-3840 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2609117032
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 0.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- World Journal of Meta-Analysis (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Keywords
- environmental tobacco smoke, passive smoking, heart disease, cardiovascular disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
