Cited by 12Child Abuse and TraumaMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Disclosure von Jugendlichen in Jugendhilfeeinrichtungen und Internaten nach sexueller Gewalterfahrung

Open access
Rau, Thea, Ohlert, Jeannine, Fegert, Jörg M., Allroggen, Marc·2016·Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie

Abstract

Disclosure of Adolescents in Residential Care Institutions and Boarding Schools after Exposure to Sexual Violence In international research, many papers exist about the issue of disclosure after having experienced sexual violence. However, specific research regarding disclosure processes of children and adolescents in institutional care are missing, even though those are particularly often affected by sexual violence. In the Germany-wide study "Sprich mit!", adolescents from the age of 15 up (n = 322; average age 16,69 (SD = 1,3); 57,1 % males) who live in residential care or boarding schools were asked for experiences of sexual violence and their consequences by means of a self-report questionnaire. Results showed that the majority of the adolescents (82 %) entrusted themselves to someone, mostly towards peers (56 %) and less frequent towards adults (24 %). Boys and girls opened up equally often, regardless of the severity of the experienced violence. Adolescents who entrusted themselves towards their peers indicated retrospectively more satisfaction than those entrusting themselves towards adults, even if there were no consequences following the disclosure. Considering that the disclosure towards peers did not initiate a process of help, adolescents in institutional care should be better informed about relevant possibilities to entrust themselves and receive support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13109/prkk.2016.65.9.638

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disclosure can impact the course of victimization by ending it and preventing revictimization.

    “Focusing on the victims, disclosure can impact the course of the victimization by ending it and preventing revictimization (e.g., Rau et al., 2016).”
  • Disclosure is critical to initiate legal steps, and reporting to law enforcement can identify and prosecute perpetrators and protect other young people.

    “Focusing on perpetrators, disclosure is critical to initiate legal steps (Rau et al., 2016). By reporting to law enforcement authorities, perpetrators can be identified and prosecuted. As a result, further victims may be identified, and other young people may be protected from victimization.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 12

Authors
Rau, T., Ohlert, J., Fegert, J. M., & Allroggen, M.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Ulm (DE)
  • German Sport University Cologne (DE)
Venue
Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie
Published
2016-11-01
Volume
65
Issue
9
Pages
638-654
ISSN
  • 0032-7034 (ISSN-L)
  • 2196-8225
OpenAlex
W2551569178
Cited by
12
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
Locations
  • Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
disclosure of sexual violence, adolescents, residential care, boarding schools, institutional care, sexual abuse, peer disclosure, help-seeking, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rape, Residential Treatment, Retrospective Studies, Schools, Self Disclosure, Sex Offenses, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review