Cited by 2Theatre and Performance StudiesClassical Philosophy and ThoughtEthics, Aesthetics, and Art

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ideality in Theatre. Or a reverse evolution of mimesis from Plato to Diderot

Open access
Ortega Máñez, María J.·2017·Aisthesis. Pratiche, linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico

Abstract

This paper deals with a development of the ancient thought on mimesis in its modern reception as regards a certain idea of theatre. It defends the hypothesis that the figure of the character, as set up in Diderot’s Paradoxe sur le comédien, has its source in a curious reversal of the Platonic mimesis. After presenting the main tenets of Plato’s reflection on mimesis and of Diderot’s theory on character, showing their convergences and contrasts, it is analyzed how such a conceptual turnaround has historically taken place, by establishing a chain of reception from Plato to Diderot passing through Cicero and the Renaissance artists.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13128/aisthesis-20911

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. As reported by Abirached (1994): 187 ss. Aristotle, 1992: Physics, books I and II, trans. W. Charlton, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  2. Aristotle, 1984: Poetics, trans. I. Bywater, in J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. II, Prince- ton University Press, Princeton (NJ).
  3. Baldry, H. C., 1975: Le Théâtre tragique des Grecs, trans. J. P. Darmont, pref. P. Vidal-Naquet, Maspero-La Découverte, Paris.
  4. Cassirer, E., 1924: Eidos und Eidolon: Das Problem des Schönen und der Kunst in Platons Dialogen, "Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg", I, Leipzig, pp. 1-27.
  5. Diderot, D., 1995 : Paradoxe sur le comédien, in A. Ménil (ed.), Diderot et le théâtre II, L' acteur, Pocket, Paris.
  6. Ferrari, G. R. F., 1989: Plato and Poetry, in G. A. Kennedy (ed.), The Cambridge History of Lit- erary Criticism, vol. I: Classical Criticism, Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge.
  7. Havelock, E., 1986: The Muse Learns to Write: Reflections on Orality and Literacy from Antiq- uity to the Present, Yale University Press, New Haven-London.
  8. Havelock, E., 1963: Preface to Plato, Harvard Uni- versity Press, Cambridge (MA).
  9. Heidegger, M., 2002: Off the Beaten Track., ed. and trans. J. Young and K. Haynes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  10. Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., 1996: A Greek-English Lexicon, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  11. Panofsky, E., 1924: Idea: Ein Beitrag zur Begriffsge- schichte der älteren Kunsttheorie; eng. trans. J. S. Peake, Idea: A concept in Art Theory, Harper & Row, New York 1968.
  12. Plato, 1937: The Republic, trans. P. Shorey, Heine- mann-Harvard University Press, London- Cambridge (MA).
  13. Plato, 1996: Ion, trans. R. E. Allen, in The Dia- logues of Plato, vol. 3, Yale University Press, New Haven-London.
  14. Plato, 1997: Charmides, trans. R. Kent Sprague, in Complete Works, ed. J. Cooper, Hackett Pub- lishing Company, Indianapolis-Cambridge.
  15. Vernant, J-P., 1975: Image et apparence dans la théorie platonicienne de la "Mimêsis", "Journal de psychologie", 2, April-June.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Ortega Máñez, M. J.
Venue
Aisthesis. Pratiche, linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico
Published
2017-07-11
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
107-116
ISSN
2035-8466 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2735891805
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Aisthesis Pratiche linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Theatre and Performance Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
Keywords
mimesis, theatre, Plato, Denis Diderot, Paradoxe sur le comédien, character, reception history, Cicero, Renaissance theatre

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review