The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
See-through Science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda
Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010701419121 · Cited by 1,777
Stirling, A. (2008) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243907311265 · Cited by 1,567
Do nanoparticles present ecotoxicological risks for the health of the aquatic environment?
Moore, M. N. (2006) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.014 · Cited by 1,253
Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics
Manson, N. C., & O'Neill, O. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814600 · Cited by 800
Ethical governance is essential to building trust in robotics and artificial intelligence systems
Winfield, A. F. T., & Jirotka, M. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0085 · Cited by 493
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilsdon, J., & Willis, R.
- Venue
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University)
- Publisher
- Lancaster University
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W1489235397
- Cited by
- 785
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: See-through Science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.13140/rg.2.1.3844.3681
- The paper
- Wilsdon, J., & Willis, R. (2004). See-through Science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.3844.3681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
