Estimating the diffuseness level of the acoustic field - reverberation chamber under study
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Values greater than 1.0 in ISO 354 measurements are a well-known issue caused by finite volume of the reverberation chamber, edge effect, sample surface calculations, and incompletely diffused sound field.
“This is a well-known issue that occurs in the ISO 354 measurement procedure, which has several causes [41,42,43], such as the finite volume of the reverberation chamber, the so-called edge effect that happens on the borders and sides of the measured samples (additional absorption), the procedure for the sample surface calculations, and the incompletely diffused sound field inside the reverberation”
From Sustainable Perforated Acoustic Wooden Panels Designed Using Third-Degree-of-Freedom Bezier Curves with Broadband Sound Absorption Coefficients (2023) · cites this paper as [41]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chojnacki, B., Schynol, K., Halek, M., & Muniak, A. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16186089 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Chojnacki, B., Pilch, A., Kamisiński, T., & Flach, A.
- Venue
- Unpublished
- Publisher
- Unpublished
- Published
- 2017
- OpenAlex
- W2989215209
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- reverberation chamber, diffuse sound field, room acoustics, sound field estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
