The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Learning 2.0 - The Impact of Social Media on Learning in Europe. Policy Brief
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Many studies regarding the use of social media in education suggest that the widespread of social media applications as an addition to formal educational settings offers new opportunities for innovating and modernizing educational institutions and for preparing learners for the 21st century (Redecker et al., 2010).”
From Social Media in Education: A Case Study Regarding Higher Education Students' Viewpoints (2022) · cites this paper as Redecker et al., 2010
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social Media in Education: A Case Study Regarding Higher Education Students' Viewpoints
Lampropoulos, G., Makkonen, P., & Siakas, K. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-93904-5_73 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., & Punie, Y.
- Venue
- Unpublished
- Publisher
- Unpublished
- Published
- 2010
- OpenAlex
- W6903667347
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital Education and Society
- Keywords
- social media, learning, educational technology, online learning, social media policy, Europe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review