Cited by 8Primary Care and Health OutcomesGlobal Health Workforce IssuesHealthcare Systems and Reforms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving Access to Family Medicine in Quebec through Quotas and Numerical Targets

Open access
McGill University, Lee, Ga Eun, Quesnel-Vallée, Amélie, McGill University·2019·Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé

Abstract

Despite various health reforms over the last 20 years, access to primary care remained stagnant in Québec, and in 2014 the province had the highest proportion of residents in Canada without a family physician.In November 2014, the Québec Minister of Health and Social Services introduced Bill 20, An Act to promote access to family medicine and specialized medicine services and to amend various legislative provisions relating to assisted procreation.Bill 20 aimed to increase access to family medicine through a system of quotas of registered patients and penalties for family physicians.Health system user support groups and the governmental advisory group on women's rights supported Bill 20's approach to ensure the rights of system users to access family physicians.However, the union of general practitioners was strongly against the bill due to the clash between the minister's reliance on numbers and the realities of family practice.The union of general practitioners entered negotiations with the minister and while Bill 20 was legalized in 2015, it was agreed that family physicians would be excused from the bill as long as they reached two targets at the end of December 2017: 1) 85% of Québecers must have a family doctor and 2) family doctors must ensure the patients registered to them see them, and not other doctors, 80% of the time.The targets were not met at the end of December 2017 but the quota system in Bill 20 has yet to be implemented. Improving Access to Family Medicine in QuébecLee & Quesnel-Vallée la fin de décembre 2017, le système de quotas prévu dans le projet de loi 20 n'a pas encore été mis en œuvre. Key Messages• Family physicians strongly opposed Bill 20, notably due to its focus on performance metrics that did not sufficiently factor in the structural constraints on family practice in Québec.• As of 25 August 2019, Bill 20's system of quotas and penalties for family physicians has yet to come into effect.• It has been suggested that Bill 20's proposal to establish patient quotas for family physicians may have served as a negotiation tool for Québec's Minister of Health and Social Services. Messages-clés• Les médecins de famille se sont fortement opposés au projet de loi 20, notamment en raison de l'emphase mise sur les indicateurs de performance qui ne tenaient pas suffisamment compte des contraintes structurelles de la pratique de médecine de famille au Québec.• En date du 25 septembre 2019, le système de quotas et de pénalités pour les médecins de famille proposé dans la loi 20 n'est toujours pas encore entré en vigueur.• D'aucuns ont suggéré que la proposition du projet de loi 20 visant à établir des quotas de patients pour les médecins de famille n'était en fait qu'un outil de négociation pour le ministre de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13162/hro-ors.v7i4.3886

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Dufresne S. 2015. Le CSF fait du tort aux femmes. Le Devoir, 4 March. https://www. ledevoir.com/opinion/libre-opinion/433396/le-csf-fait-du-tort-aux-femmes FMOQ (Fédération des médecins omnipraticiens du Québec). 2013. Working group re- port on access to primary care. https://fmoq-legacy.s3.amazonaws.com/en/Union% 20Affairs/President's%20Office/Letters/EN-Rapport-acessibilite-2013-11-11.pdf
  2. Gladu F-P. 2007. Perceived shortage of family doctors in Quebec: can we do something about it? Canadian Family Physician 53(11): 1858-1860.
  3. Vigie.Bll.DocumentGenerique_105133&process=Original&token=ZyMoxNwUn8ikQ+ TRKYwPCjWrKwg+vIv9rjij7p3xLGTZDmLVSmJLoqe/vG7/YWzz MSSS (Ministry of Health and Social Services). 2017a. Accès à un médecin de famille-la Grande Inscription. Bulletin of the Minister, 25 October. http://www.msss.gouv.qc. ca/ministere/salle-de-presse/communique-1415/
  4. MSSS (Ministry of Health and Social Services). 2017b. 1 million de personnes de plus ont maintenant accès à un médecin de famille. Bulletin of the Minister, 20 December. http://www.msss.gouv.qc.ca/ministere/salle-de-presse/communique-1461

Metadata

Authors
McGill University, Lee, G. E., Quesnel-Vallée, A., & McGill University
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Venue
Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé
Published
2019-10-09
Volume
7
Issue
4
ISSN
2291-6369 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2979447681
Cited by
8
References
6
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Keywords
primary care access, numerical targets, general practitioners, performance indicators, health policy, physician unions, Quebec health system, health care reform, women's rights, physician-patient relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review