How does the level of the anti-dumping duty affect the trade re-routing phenomenon?
Open accessAbstract
Purpose. The practice of trade re-routing, where goods are redirected through intermediary countries to evade anti-dumping duties, poses significant challenges for global trade regulation. While this phenomenon is well-documented, the specific relationship between the intensity of trade re-routing with the level of anti-dumping duties and the involvement of multiple countries has not been fully explored. This study advances the research by investigating the direct correlation between anti- umping duty levels and the scale of re-routing activities, offering a more nuanced understanding of how varying duty levels influence firms’ strategic responses.Methods. Drawing on trade data from 2014 to 2023, we employ econometric analysis to examine how anti-dumping discount fluctuations affect trade volume through third countries.Findings. Our findings reveal that when duty levels are high, firms’ incentive for trade re-routing increases, and the phenomenon’s intensity rises, with multiple intermediary countries being employed to obscure their trade routes further. The results provide empirical evidence that higher duty levels substantially increase the incentive for trade re-routing. In contrast, lower duties tend to reduce the motivation for such practices.Originality. Focusing specifically on the intensity of the re-routing phenomenon and the complexity of intermediary involvement in response to duty levels, this study goes beyond existing literature to provide deeper insights into the conditions that drive or mitigate duty evasion tactics.Practical implications.This research has critical implications for policymakers, as it highlights the limitations of current anti-dumping measures in addressing circumvention. The study underscores the need for more sophisticated detection and prevention mechanisms to counter firms’ adaptive strategies, particularly when facing high-duty scenarios. Our findings contribute to thebroader trade enforcement discourse by offering theoretical and practical implications for strengthening international trade governance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 2
- Authors
- Ketsetsidis, A., & Victoria, P.
- Affiliations
- Democritus University of Thrace (GR)
- Venue
- Intellectual Economics
- Publisher
- Mykolas Romeris University
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1822-8011 (ISSN-L)
- 1822-8038
- OpenAlex
- W4405727720
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Intellectual Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Trade Organization Law
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Law, logistics, and international trade
- Keywords
- antidumping duties, global trade governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review