Cited by 255Fusion materials and technologiesCold Fusion and Nuclear ReactionsMagnetic confinement fusion research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Lunar Source of3He for Commercial Fusion Power

Abstract

An analysis of astrophysical information indicates that the solar wind has deposited an abundant, easily extractable source of 3He onto the surface of the moon. Apollo lunar samples indicate that the moon’s surface soil contains ∼109 kg of 3He. If this amount of 3He were to be used in a 50% efficient D-3He fusion reactor, it would provide 107 GW(electric)·yr of electrical power. The energy required to extract 3He from the lunar regolith and transport it to earth is calculated to be ∼2400 GJ/kg. Since the D-3He reaction produces 6 × 105 GJ of energy per kilogram of 3He, the energy payback ratio is ∼250. Implications for the commercialization of D-3He fusion reactors and for the development of fusion power are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13182/fst86-a24972

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 26 · Cited by 255

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. DAWSON J. M., 1981, Fusion, 1
  2. PARKINSON R. C., 1978, J. Br. Interplanet. Soc., 583
  3. 1985, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
  4. T. N. COCHRAN, W. M. ARKIN, and M. W. HOENIG, Eds. “Nuclear Weapon Databook, Vol. 1, U.S. Nuclear Forces and Capabilities,” Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1984).
  5. WALDRON R. D., 1982, Space Utilization, 1
  6. Landolt-Bornstein Numerical Data, New Series, Vol. 2a—Astronomy and Physics, p. 135, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1981).
  7. HO D., 1979, Space Resources and Space Settlements, 225
  8. ATZENI S., 1980, Comments Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion, 6, 77
  9. 1983, Nucl. Technol./Fusion, 4, 295
  10. SHUY G. W., 1986, Fusion Technol., 9
  11. KULCINSKI G. L., 1984, Atomkernenergie-Kerntechnik, 44, 1
  12. ENGLERT GERALD W., 1962, New Sci., 16, 16
  13. DIMOV G. I., 1976, Fiz. Plazmy, 2, 597
  14. FOWLER T. K., 1977, Comments Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion, 2, 167
  15. 1979, Phys. Fluids, 22, 1006, 10.1063/1.862828 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Wittenberg, L. J., Santarius, J. F., & Kulcinski, G. L.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Fusion Technology
Published
1986-09
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
167-178
ISSN
0748-1896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2742185811
Cited by
255
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
13.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fusion Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Lamar University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Fusion materials and technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Cold Fusion and Nuclear Reactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
Keywords
helium-3, lunar helium-3, solar wind, lunar regolith, D-3He fusion, lunar resource extraction, commercial fusion power, Apollo samples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review