The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Project-based Learning to Enhance Pre-service Teachers' Teaching Skills in Science Education
Open accessAbstract
Project-based learning (PBL) is a constructivist approach to learning which has been used successfully in a variety of settings and has received recognition as a method of enabling students to acquire 21st century skills (Cyprian, 2014: & Al- Ali, 2015). Some (Al-Saifi, 2016; Taskin-Can, 2011; & Baysura et al., 2016) have argued that if pre-service teachers are to be effective at implementing PBL with their students, they need repeated experiential exposure to the model in their university teacher training programs. One area of investigation has focused on the ability of pre-service teachers to implement the PBL model within their own classroom instructional experiences despite demonstrating adequate knowledge about PBL in their university coursework. The purpose of this manuscript is to address the value of preparing pre-service teachers to be K-12 science teachers through immersing them in PBL methodology in order to enhance their future teaching practices by modeling PBL teaching methodology in their university courses. It also sheds the light on online implementation of PBL and technology integration. 45 relevant studies have been reviewed in this manuscript. The challenges of implementing PBL found in the literature were mainly related to four: programs' policy, professional development, environment, and students’ willingness. Professional development sessions for faculty members, partnerships with local and international organizations specialists in this area of learning, and continuous evaluation of the current programs can be helpful strategies in achieving successful implementation of PBL in teacher preparation programs. Implementing PBL in teacher preparation programs contributes in fully integrating theory and practice; and positively influences student teachers’ professional, academic and personal skills.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ruswa, N., & Nhase, Z. (2026) · Journal of Education and Learning Technology · doi:10.38159/jelt.20267410
Metadata
- Authors
- Alrajeh, T. S.
- Venue
- Universal Journal of Educational Research
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 271-279
- ISSN
- 2332-3205 (ISSN-L)
- 2332-3213
- OpenAlex
- W3136620092
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 8.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Universal Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › STEM Education
- Keywords
- project-based learning, pre-service teachers, science teacher education, teaching skills, K-12 science teachers, technology integration, teacher education curriculum, professional development, theory-practice integration, constructivist learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Project-based Learning to Enhance Pre-service Teachers' Teaching Skills in Science Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.13189/ujer.2021.090202
- The paper
- Alrajeh, T. S. (2021). Project-based Learning to Enhance Pre-service Teachers' Teaching Skills in Science Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.090202