The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rethinking depoliticisation: beyond the governmental
Abstract
Stagnating political participation, the growth of delegated agencies and the prevalence of rationalistic-technocratic discourse all represent interlinking aspects of what can been termed ‘the depoliticised polity’. Existing research has overwhelmingly focused on institutional or governmental depoliticisation strategies and fails to acknowledge repoliticisation as a critical counter-trend. This article argues that these weaknesses can be addressed through ‘a three faces’ approach that embraces societal and discursive depoliticisation strategies as complementary statecraft dynamics that often underpin more tangible governmental strategies. By revealing the existence of multiple forms of depoliticisation this approach also offers new insights in terms of politicisation and sociopolitical change.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It may appear somewhat odd to advocate depoliticization of functions as a means of preserving democratic governance, but it can be used to ensure that important functions of the State continue to be undertaken in a legal and professional manner (but see Wood and Flinders, 2014).”
From The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Wood and Flinders, 2014
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Guardian State: Strengthening the public service against democratic backsliding
Yesilkagit, K., Bauer, M., Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2024) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13808 · Cited by 112
“Guided by the science”: (De)politicising the UK government’s response to the coronavirus crisis
Kettell, S., & Kerr, P. (2022) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1177/13691481211054957 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, M., & Flinders, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- ORCID
- Flinders, Matthew
- Venue
- Policy & Politics
- Publisher
- Bristol University Press
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 151-170
- ISSN
- 0305-5736 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8442
- OpenAlex
- W2563226328
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 59.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Policy & Politics (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
- Keywords
- depoliticization, repoliticization, political participation, technocratic discourse, statecraft, politicization, social and political change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review