The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving policy implementation through collaborative policymaking
Open accessAbstract
We offer a fresh perspective on implementation problems by suggesting that collaborative policy design and adaptive policy implementation will help public policy makers to improve policy execution. Classical implementation theories have focused too narrowly on administrative stumbling blocks and New Public Management has reinforced the split between politics and administration. Attempts to improve policy implementation must begin by looking at policy design, which can be improved through collaboration and deliberation between upstream and downstream actors. We provide a broad overview of how collaborative policymaking and adaptive policy implementation might work in theory and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032 · Cited by 8,256
Self-citationAn Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011 · Cited by 3,637
Cited by
Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help?
Hudson, B., Hunter, D., & Peckham, S. (2019) · Policy Design and Practice · doi:10.1080/25741292.2018.1540378 · Cited by 721
Uyarra, E., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Flanagan, K., & Magro, E. (2020) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103844 · Cited by 280
The contested nature of New Public Governance as a third governance model
van Gestel, N., & Ferlie, E. (2026) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2026.2645329 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J.
- Venue
- Policy & Politics
- Publisher
- Bristol University Press
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 467-486
- ISSN
- 0305-5736 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8442
- OpenAlex
- W2624887282
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 66.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving policy implementation through collaborative policymaking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1332/030557317x14972799760260
- The paper
- Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2017). Improving policy implementation through collaborative policymaking. Policy & Politics. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317x14972799760260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.