Cited by 11Digital Media and PhilosophyPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Social Media and the Automatic Production of Memory: Classification, Ranking and the Sorting of the Past

Jacobsen, Ben, Beer, David·2021·Policy Press eBooks

Abstract

Social media platforms hold vast amounts of biographical data about our lives. They repackage our past content as ‘memories’ and deliver them back to us. But how does that change the way we remember? Drawing on original qualitative research as well as industry documents and reports, this book critically explores the process behind this new form of memory making. In asking how social media are beginning to change the way we remember, it will be essential reading for scholars and students who are interested in understanding the algorithmically defined spaces of our lives.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1332/policypress/9781529218152.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jacobsen, B., & Beer, D.
Venue
Policy Press eBooks
Published
2021-04-01
OpenAlex
W4206335074
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.27
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Policy Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Keywords
social media, memory, autobiographical memory, algorithmic curation, memory formation, biographical information, platform algorithms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review