Cited by 11Educational Technology and E-LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Technology in Learning

Pedagogical scenarios enriched with audiovisual technologies and their impact on the promotion of the learning skills of inmate students in Portugal

Open access
Dias-Trindade, Sara, Moreira, J. António·2019·Digital Education Review

Abstract

Over the last decades and largely due to changes taking place in labour markets, there has been a pressing need to rethink pedagogical processes. Today, educational institutions face the challenge of not only having to create learning environments conducive to the acquisition of knowledge, but also scenarios suited to the development of learning skills. Our analysis will focus precisely on one of such scenarios and will determine its impact on the learning skills of twenty inmate students, based on the qualitative analysis of their perceptions and narratives and using the Pedagogical Model developed by Author (2017) for the design of e-learning activities focused on the “deconstruction” of moving images as a reference. The findings show that the design of the environment, based on this model and on the use of audiovisual technologies, can have very positive effects on inmate students’ self-learning in the following dimensions: Active Learning, Initiative and Autonomy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1344/der.2019.35.97-110

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital skills are a prerequisite to participate in 21st-century social life.

    “Considering that Digital Technologies (DT) skills is a prerequisite to participate in 21st-century social life, it is also important to identify to what extent it is visible (Dias-Trindade & Moreira, 2019).”

    From Learning with digital technologies in prison: a scoping review (2023) · cites this paper as Dias-Trindade & Moreira, 2019

    The available Abstract discusses audiovisual technologies and the self-learning skills of inmate students, but does not address whether digital skills are necessary for participation in social life. Searches for that claim and for digital competence and social inclusion returned only the Abstract and References, with no passage stating the prerequisite. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Aguaded-Gómez, I., & Pérez-Rodríguez, M. A. (2012). Strategies for media literacy: Audiovisual skills and the citizenship in Andalusia. New Approaches in Educational Research, 1(1), 22-26.
  2. Buckingham, D. (2009). The future of media literacy in the digital age: some challenges for policy and practice. In P. Verniers (Ed.), Media literacy in Europe: controversies, challenges and perspectives (pp. 13-24). Bruxelles: EuroMeduc.
  3. Campos, S. (2015). Sistemas prisionais europeus [European Prisoner Systems]. (Unpublished master's thesis). Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon.
  4. Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Luxembourg Publication Office of the European Union. Doi:10.2760/38842 · DOI
  5. European Parliament and the Council (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, L394/310.
  6. Gutiérrez, A., & Tyner, K. (2012). Media Literacy in Multiple Contexts. Comunicar, 38, 10-12. DOI: 10.3916/C38-2012-02-00 · DOI
  7. Lima Santos, N., Faria, L. & Rurato, P. (2000). Educação e aprendizagem de adultos: Avaliação do autoconceito de competência cognitiva e da autoaprendizagem [Education and adult learning: evaluation of self-concept of cognitive competence and self learning]. Revista Galego-Portuguesa de Psicoloxía e Educación, 6(4), 649-656.
  8. Moreira, J. A. (2017). A pedagogical model to deconstruct moving pictures in virtual learning environments and its impact on the self-concept of postgraduate students. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society,13 (1), 77-90. Retrieved from: http://www.je-lks.org/ojs/index.php/Je-LKS_EN/article/view/1255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1255 · DOI
  9. Preece, J. (2011). Research in adult education and lifelong learning in the era of CONFINTEA VI. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 30 (1), 99-117.
  10. Rurato, P. (2008). As Características dos Aprendentes na Educação a Distância – Impacto no Processo Educativo com vista ao Desenvolvimento de Estratégias de Sucesso [The characteristics of learners in Distance Learning - impact on the educational process for developing success strategies] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro.
  11. Spiro, R., Vispoel, W., Schmitz, J., Samarapungavan, A., & Boerger, A. (1987), Knowledge Aquisition for Application: Cognitive Flexibility and Transfer in Complex Content Domains, In B. Britton & C. Glynn C. (eds.), Executive Control in Processes in Reading (p. 177-199), New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  12. Spiro, R., Coulson, R., Feltovich, P., & Anderson, D. (1988). Cognitive flexibility: Advanced knowledge acquisition ill-structured domains. Proc. of the Tenth Annual Conference of Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 375-383.
  13. Vala, J. A. (1986). Análise de conteúdo [Content analysis]. In A. Silva & J. Pinto (eds.), Metodologia das Ciências Sociais [Methodology of social sciences]. Porto: Edições afrontamento.
  14. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005), Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments, Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dias-Trindade, S., & Moreira, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • Universidade Aberta (PT)
Venue
Digital Education Review
Published
2019-06-25
Pages
97-110
ISSN
2013-9144 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2967232493
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Digital Education Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert) (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
audiovisual technology, learning skills, prison education, e-learning design, self-learning, active learning, learner autonomy, initiative, teaching model, student perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review