Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Medication Adherence and Associated Hemoglobin A1c in Type 2 Diabetes

Krapek, Kimberley, King, Kathleen, Warren, Susan S, George, Karen G, Caputo, Dorothy A, Mihelich, Karen, Holst, Elizabeth M, Nichol, Michael B, Shi, Sheng G, Livengood, Kevin B, Walden, Steve, Lubowski, Teresa J·2004·Annals of Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tight blood glucose control has been correlated with a reduction in diabetes complications. Adherence to antidiabetic medications is crucial to achieving blood glucose control. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between good glucose control [glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA 1c) levels] and adherence to prescribed treatment in patients on a stable medication regimen for type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The Morisky survey, a 4–item questionnaire that predicts patient medication-taking behavior, was used to assess adherence in 301 patients. The relationship of HbA 1c to Morisky score was evaluated, controlling for other variables related to patient demographics and clinical characteristics. Data were analyzed using a general linear model on log (HbA 1c). RESULTS: Unadjusted mean HbA 1c values (capped at 14.0%) for patients with Morisky scores of 0 or 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 8.92%, 8.67%, 7.74%, and 7.60%, respectively. Of all patients, 13.0%, 14.0%, 24.3%, and 48.8% had scores of 0 or 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Good adherence (Morisky score ≥3) was associated with a 10% lower total HbA 1c (p = 0.0003) adjusted for all other factors in the model. Duration of diabetes (5–10 y) and presence of diabetes complications were also significantly associated with HbA 1c (p = 0.026 and 0.002, respectively). Adherence was poor in 27% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that patients with a higher score on the Morisky scale had a lower associated HbA 1c measurement. The Morisky score may be an efficient tool for identifying patients with poor medication-taking behavior who can then be targeted for directed adherence counseling services.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1345/aph.1d612

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Krapek, K., King, K., Warren, S. S., George, K. G., Caputo, D. A., Mihelich, K., Holst, E. M., Nichol, M. B., Shi, S. G., Livengood, K. B., Walden, S., & Lubowski, T. J.
Venue
Annals of Pharmacotherapy
Published
2004-09
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
1357-1362
ISSN
  • 0012-6578 (ISSN-L)
  • 1060-0280
  • 1542-6270
OpenAlex
W2113893668
Cited by
287
References
17
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medication Adherence and Associated Hemoglobin A1c in Type 2 Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1345/aph.1d612
The paper
Krapek, K., King, K., Warren, S. S., George, K. G., Caputo, D. A., Mihelich, K., Holst, E. M., Nichol, M. B., Shi, S. G., Livengood, K. B., Walden, S., & Lubowski, T. J. (2004). Medication Adherence and Associated Hemoglobin A1c in Type 2 Diabetes. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1d612

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.