Contrasting measures of adherence with simple drug use, medication switching, and therapeutic duplication.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple measures of adherence have been reported in the research literature and it is difficult to determine which is best, as each is nuanced. Occurrences of medication switching and polypharmacy or therapeutic duplication can substantially complicate adherence calculations when adherence to a therapeutic class is sought. OBJECTIVE: To contrast the Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) adherence metric with 2 variants of the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR, truncated MPR). METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of the North Carolina Medicaid administrative claims data from July 1999 to June 2000. Data for patients with schizophrenia (ICD-9-CM code 295.xx) who were not part of a health maintenance organization, not hospitalized, and not pregnant, taking at least one antipsychotic, were aggregated for each person into person-quarters. The numerator for PDC was defined as the number of days one or more antipsychotics was available and the MPR numerator was defined as the total days' supply of antipsychotics; both were divided by the total days in each person-quarter. Adherence rates were estimated for subjects who used only one antipsychotic, switched medications, or had therapeutic duplication in the quarter. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 25,200 person-quarters from 7069 individuals. For person-quarters with single antipsychotic use, adherence to antipsychotics as a class was: PDC 0.607, truncated MPR 0.640, and MPR 0.695 (p < 0.001). For person-quarters with switching, the average MPR was 0.690, truncated MPR was 0.624, and PDC was 0.562 (p < 0.001). In the presence of therapeutic duplication, the PDC was 0.669, truncated MPR was 0.774, and MPR was 1.238 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The PDC provides a more conservative estimate of adherence than the MPR across all types of users; however, the differences between the 2 methods are more substantial for persons switching therapy and prescribed therapeutic duplication, where MPR may overstate true adherence. The PDC should be considered when a measure of adherence to a class of medications is sought, particularly in clinical situations in which multiple medications within a class are often used concurrently.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PDC has been affirmed to be a more accurate and conservative representation of adherence compared to MPR.
“PDC has been affirmed to be a more accurate and conservative representation of adherence compared to MPR”
From Using Dispensing Data to Evaluate Adherence Implementation Rates in Community Pharmacy (2019) · cites this paper as Martin et al., 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 226
- Authors
- Martin, B. C., Wiley-Exley, E. K., Richards, S., Domino, M. E., Carey, T. S., & Sleath, B. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Martin, Bradley C
- Venue
- Annals of Pharmacotherapy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-44
- ISSN
- 0012-6578 (ISSN-L)
- 1060-0280
- 1542-6270
- OpenAlex
- W2151644601
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Keywords
- medication adherence, proportion of days covered, medication possession ratio, drug switching, therapeutic duplication, polypharmacy, antipsychotic drugs, schizophrenia, Medicaid
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Medicaid, Medication Errors, Middle Aged, North Carolina, Patient Compliance, Retrospective Studies, Antipsychotic Agents, United States, Treatment Refusal, Prescriptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review