The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The analysis of repeated measures designs: A review
Abstract
Repeated measures ANOVA can refer to many different types of analysis. Specifically, this vague term can refer to conventional tests of significance, one of three univariate solutions with adjusted degrees of freedom, two different types of multivariate statistic, or approaches that combine univariate and multivariate tests. Accordingly, it is argued that, by only reporting probability values and referring to statistical analyses as repeated measures ANOVA, authors convey neither the type of analysis that was used nor the validity of the reported probability value, since each of these approaches has its own strengths and weaknesses. The various approaches are presented with a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses, and recommendations are made regarding the ‘best’ choice of analysis. Additional topics discussed include analyses for missing data and tests of linear contrasts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Under the MAR assumption, the maximum likelihood approach and multiple imputation will yield sensible parameter estimates.62”
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
Littell, R. C. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,345
RUBIN, D. B. (1976) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581 · Cited by 9,925
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data
Booth, D. E., & Schafer, J. L. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271466 · Cited by 5,627
On Methods in the Analysis of Profile Data
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289823 · Cited by 4,946
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Savard, J., Simard, S., Ivers, H., & Morin, C. M. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.09.548 · Cited by 507
What You See Is What You Get? Enhancing Methodological Transparency in Management Research
Aguinis, H., Ramani, R. S., & Alabduljader, N. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0011 · Cited by 517
Linear mixed-effects modeling approach to FMRI group analysis
Chen, G., Saad, Z. S., Britton, J. C., Pine, D. S., & Cox, R. W. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.047 · Cited by 440
Color and emotion: effects of hue, saturation, and brightness
Wilms, L., & Oberfeld, D. (2017) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0880-8 · Cited by 452
An introduction to multiplicity issues in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how
Li, G., Taljaard, M., Van den Heuvel, E. R., Levine, M. A., Cook, D. J., Wells, G. A., Devereaux, P. J., & Thabane, L. (2016) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyw320 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Keselman, H. J., Algina, J., & Kowalchuk, R. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Keselman, H. J.
- ORCID
- Algina, James
- Venue
- British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-20
- ISSN
- 0007-1102 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8317
- OpenAlex
- W2125118056
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 12.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
- Keywords
- repeated measures ANOVA, multivariate analysis of variance, univariate analysis, missing data, linear contrasts, statistical reporting
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Probability, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
