Cited by 194Historical and Modern Theater StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Dysexecutive symptoms among a non‐clinical sample: A study with the use of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire

Chan, Raymond C. K.·2001·British Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Clinical studies indicate that damage to the frontal lobes may lead to a set of symptoms collectively known as 'Dysexecutive syndrome', which is characterized by changes in emotion, personality, motivation, behaviour and cognitive aspects. Factor analytical study using questionnaires measuring dysexecutive problems in everyday life also suggests a fractionation of the dysexecutive syndrome among patients with neurological disorders. As yet, very little research has been conducted to explore the base-rate of executive problems in everyday life among the non-clinical population. This pilot study aimed to explore dysexecutive behaviour similar to that of dysexecutive syndrome reported by a non-clinical sample. A total of 93 presumably normal participants were recruited. The Dysexecutive Questionnaire and a set of clinical tests of executive function were administered to all the participants. A 5-factor solution very similar to that of a previous study was derived: inhibition (factor 1), intentionality (factor 2), knowing-doing dissociation (factor 3), in-resistance (factor 4), and social regulation (factor 5). Correlation was established among the derived factors and tests of executive function. This study provides empirical evidence that a non-clinical sample may encounter similar dysexecutive behaviours in daily life. The issue of the fractionation of the executive system among the non-clinical sample will also be discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/000712601162338

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, R. C. K.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Chan, Raymond C. K.
Venue
British Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-08
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
551-565
ISSN
  • 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8295
OpenAlex
W2082348827
Cited by
194
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
dysexecutive syndrome, executive function, Dysexecutive Questionnaire, non-clinical population, frontal lobe damage, inhibition, intentionality, social regulation, factor structure
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition Disorders, Decision Making, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review