Dysexecutive symptoms among a non‐clinical sample: A study with the use of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire
Abstract
Clinical studies indicate that damage to the frontal lobes may lead to a set of symptoms collectively known as 'Dysexecutive syndrome', which is characterized by changes in emotion, personality, motivation, behaviour and cognitive aspects. Factor analytical study using questionnaires measuring dysexecutive problems in everyday life also suggests a fractionation of the dysexecutive syndrome among patients with neurological disorders. As yet, very little research has been conducted to explore the base-rate of executive problems in everyday life among the non-clinical population. This pilot study aimed to explore dysexecutive behaviour similar to that of dysexecutive syndrome reported by a non-clinical sample. A total of 93 presumably normal participants were recruited. The Dysexecutive Questionnaire and a set of clinical tests of executive function were administered to all the participants. A 5-factor solution very similar to that of a previous study was derived: inhibition (factor 1), intentionality (factor 2), knowing-doing dissociation (factor 3), in-resistance (factor 4), and social regulation (factor 5). Correlation was established among the derived factors and tests of executive function. This study provides empirical evidence that a non-clinical sample may encounter similar dysexecutive behaviours in daily life. The issue of the fractionation of the executive system among the non-clinical sample will also be discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The DEX has been shown to reliably assess activation dysfunction in clinical and research settings.
“The DEX has been shown to reliably assess activation dysfunction in clinical and research settings, highlighting its relevance for understanding executive function challenges among university students and young adults [10,11].”
From Sociodemographic influences on Student Mental Health and their association with activation-regulating functional impairments (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessment of executive functions: Review of instruments and identification of critical issues.
CHAN, R., SHUM, D., TOULOPOULOU, T., & CHEN, E. (2008) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.010 · Cited by 1,401 · see citing works
Self-citationImproving the ecological validity of executive functioning assessment
CHAYTOR, N., SCHMITTEREDGECOMBE, M., & BURR, R. (2006) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.12.002 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Johnson, J. K., Lui, L.-Y., & Yaffe, K. (2007) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/62.10.1134 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Fassbender, C., Murphy, K., Foxe, J. J., Wylie, G. R., Javitt, D. C., Robertson, I. H., & Garavan, H. (2004) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.02.007 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Buchanan, T. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000192 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
BENNETT, P. C., ONG, B., & PONSFORD, J. (2005) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617705050423 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Psychometric validation of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX)
Shaw, S., Oei, T. P. S., & Sawang, S. (2015) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0038195 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Fraiwan, M., Almomani, F., & Hammouri, H. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0342731 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chan, R. C. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Chan, Raymond C. K.
- ORCID
- Chan, Raymond C. K.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 551-565
- ISSN
- 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8295
- OpenAlex
- W2082348827
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- dysexecutive syndrome, executive function, Dysexecutive Questionnaire, non-clinical population, frontal lobe damage, inhibition, intentionality, social regulation, factor structure
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cognition Disorders, Decision Making, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review