The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Conceptualization and measurement of celebrity worship
Abstract
Celebrity worship has been conceptualized as having pathological and nonpathological forms. To avoid problems associated with item-level factor analysis, 'top-down purification' was used to test the validity of this conceptualization. The respondents (N = 249) completed items modelled after existing celebrity worship questionnaires. A subset of 17 unidimensional and Rasch scalable items was discovered (the local reliability ranged from.71 to.96), which showed no biases related to age and gender. This subset was dubbed the Celebrity Worship Scale (CWS). The items also showed no celebrity bias, indicating that CWS applies equally to acting, music, sports, and 'other' celebrities. The Rasch nature of the items defines celebrity worship as consisting of three qualitatively different stages. Low worship involves individualistic behaviours such as watching and reading about a celebrity. At slightly higher levels, celebrity worship takes on a social character. Lastly, the highest levels are characterized by a mixture of empathy with the celebrity's successes and failures, over-identification with the celebrity, compulsive behaviours, as well as obsession with details of the celebrity's life. Based on these findings, the authors propose a model of celebrity worship based on psychological absorption (leading to delusions of actual relationships with celebrities) and addiction (fostering the need for progressively stronger involvement to feel connected with the celebrity).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The cultlike status of celebrities (Brooks, 2021; McCutcheon et al., 2002) may rest on virtually all of them being in the business of storytelling.”
From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as McCutcheon et al., 2002
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 454
Metadata
- Authors
- McCutcheon, L. E., Lange, R., & Houran, J.
- Affiliations
- Florida Southern College (US)
- Illinois State Board of Education (US)
- SIU Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCutcheon, Lynn E.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-87
- ISSN
- 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8295
- OpenAlex
- W2120636523
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Keywords
- celebrity worship, celebrity identification, compulsive behaviour, scale development, Rasch analysis
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Famous Persons, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Motion Pictures, Perception, Social Behavior, Social Conditions, Television
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptualization and measurement of celebrity worship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/000712602162454
- The paper
- McCutcheon, L. E., Lange, R., & Houran, J. (2002). Conceptualization and measurement of celebrity worship. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602162454