Cited by 454Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Conceptualization and measurement of celebrity worship

McCutcheon, Lynn E., Lange, Rense, Houran, James·2002·British Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Celebrity worship has been conceptualized as having pathological and nonpathological forms. To avoid problems associated with item-level factor analysis, 'top-down purification' was used to test the validity of this conceptualization. The respondents (N = 249) completed items modelled after existing celebrity worship questionnaires. A subset of 17 unidimensional and Rasch scalable items was discovered (the local reliability ranged from.71 to.96), which showed no biases related to age and gender. This subset was dubbed the Celebrity Worship Scale (CWS). The items also showed no celebrity bias, indicating that CWS applies equally to acting, music, sports, and 'other' celebrities. The Rasch nature of the items defines celebrity worship as consisting of three qualitatively different stages. Low worship involves individualistic behaviours such as watching and reading about a celebrity. At slightly higher levels, celebrity worship takes on a social character. Lastly, the highest levels are characterized by a mixture of empathy with the celebrity's successes and failures, over-identification with the celebrity, compulsive behaviours, as well as obsession with details of the celebrity's life. Based on these findings, the authors propose a model of celebrity worship based on psychological absorption (leading to delusions of actual relationships with celebrities) and addiction (fostering the need for progressively stronger involvement to feel connected with the celebrity).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/000712602162454

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 454

Metadata

Authors
McCutcheon, L. E., Lange, R., & Houran, J.
Affiliations
  • Florida Southern College (US)
  • Illinois State Board of Education (US)
  • SIU Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
McCutcheon, Lynn E.
Venue
British Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-02
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
67-87
ISSN
  • 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8295
OpenAlex
W2120636523
Cited by
454
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
celebrity worship, celebrity identification, compulsive behaviour, scale development, Rasch analysis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Famous Persons, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Motion Pictures, Perception, Social Behavior, Social Conditions, Television

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptualization and measurement of celebrity worship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/000712602162454
The paper
McCutcheon, L. E., Lange, R., & Houran, J. (2002). Conceptualization and measurement of celebrity worship. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602162454