The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A randomized controlled trial of the effects of multi‐sensory stimulation (MSS) for people with dementia
Abstract
Objectives. To investigate short‐term effects of Multi‐Sensory Stimulation (MSS) on behaviour, mood and cognition of older adults with dementia, the generalization of effects to day hospital and home environments and the endurance of any effects over time. Design. A randomized controlled trial comparing MSS with a credible control of one‐to‐one activities. Methods. Fifty patients with diagnoses of moderate to severe dementia were randomized to either MSS or Activity groups. Patients participated in eight 30‐minute sessions over a 4‐week period. Ratings of behaviour and mood were taken before, during and after sessions to investigate immediate effects. Pre, mid, post‐trial, and follow‐up assessments were taken to investigate any generalization of effects on cognition, behaviour at the day hospital and behaviour and mood at home and endurance of effects once sessions had ceased. Results. Immediately after MSS and Activity sessions patients talked more spontaneously, related better to others, did more from their own initiative, were less bored/inactive, and were more happy, active or alert. Both groups were more attentive to their environment than before, with a significantly greater improvement from the MSS group. At the day hospital, patients in the Activity group improved on their ‘speech skills’ (amount of speech; initiation of speech), whereas the MSS group remained unchanged during the trial. The MSS group showed a significant improvement in mood and behaviour at home compared to the Activity group whose behaviour deteriorated. No longer‐term benefits were shown; indeed, behaviour declined sharply during the month follow‐up period. Conclusions. Both MSS and Activity sessions appear to be effective and appropriate therapies for people with dementia.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sensory stimulation interventions have been found to reduce passive behaviors, 45 provide more constructive engagement and pleasure, 42,46 and improve behaviors. 47-49”
From Therapeutic recreation interventions for need-driven dementia-compromised (2002) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Livingston, G., Johnston, K., Katona, C., Paton, J., Lyketsos, C. G., & Old Age Task Force of the World Federation of Biological Psychiatry (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.11.1996 · Cited by 591
Abraha, I., Rimland, J. M., Trotta, F. M., Dell'Aquila, G., Cruz-Jentoft, A., Petrovic, M., Gudmundsson, A., Soiza, R., O'Mahony, D., Guaita, A., et al. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012759 · Cited by 557
Zucchella, C., Sinforiani, E., Tamburin, S., Federico, A., Mantovani, E., Bernini, S., Casale, R., & Bartolo, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.01058 · Cited by 297
“, interventions aimed to promote the arousal of the patients’ senses (178).”
BackgroundImpact of the Design of the Built Environment on People with Dementia: An Evidence-Based Review
Marquardt, G., Büter, K., & Motzek, T. (2014) · HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal · doi:10.1177/193758671400800111 · Cited by 261
“Better well being, including improvements in mood, was found in three studies at evidence levels 2 and 3a (Baker et al., 2001; Cox, Burns, & Savage, 2004; Hope et al., 1998).”
BackgroundLong-term care for people with dementia: environmental design guidelines
Fleming, R., & Purandare, N. (2010) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610210000438 · Cited by 201
“and Marshall-Baker, A. (1995). The effects of visual barriers on exiting behavior”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, R., Bell, S., Baker, E., Holloway, J., Pearce, R., Dowling, Z., Thomas, P., Assey, J., & Wareing, L.
- Affiliations
- Poole Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pearce, Rebecca
- Venue
- British Journal of Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-96
- ISSN
- 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8260
- OpenAlex
- W2092893498
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Keywords
- multisensory stimulation, dementia, mood, cognition, day hospital, family environment, treatment effects over time, speaking skills, older adults
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Affect, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Mental Disorders, Communication, Environment, Female, Generalization, Psychological, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Relaxation Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review