Autobiographical memories become less vivid and emotional after eye movements
Abstract
Objectives To test (1) whether eye movements during retrieval of emotional memories are followed by less vividness and less emotionality of future recollections, (2) whether this effect, if present, is stronger than the effects of a control activity (finger tapping), (3) whether the alleged effects of tapping and eye movements are stronger than a no-movement, control condition (mere imagery), (4) whether reductions in vividness and emotionality after eye movements (and finger tapping) are specific to negative memories or also occur in the case of positive memories. Method Sixty healthy volunteers recalled either positive or negative memories and scored the vividness and emotionality of the recollections. Next, memories were recalled whilst the participant was performing rapid eye movements, finger tapping, or not performing a dual task. Then participants were asked to recall the event again and to rate its vividness and emotionality. Results Compared to finger tapping and the no-dual-task condition, recollections after eye movements made future recollections less vivid. After eye movements, but not after the other interventions, negative memories became less negative, and positive memories became less positive. Conclusion The findings show that eye movements not only reduce vividness and emotionality of memories during the eye moving, but also affect future recollections, during which no eye movements are made. Some theoretical explanations are discussed. As to clinical impli…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EMDR interventions have generally been found to reduce the vividness and distress of targeted aversive memories compared to recall only.
“EMDR interventions (including laboratory models of EMDR) have generally been found to reduce the vividness and distress of targeted aversive memories compared to recall only (e.g., Gunter and Bodner 2008;van den Hout et al. 2001), which may also come with memory reappraisal (Gunter and Bodner 2008).”
From Negative Flashforward Imagery in Adolescent Social Anxiety Disorder: A Pilot Study of Imagery Reports and a Short EMDR Intervention. (2024) · cites this paper as van den Hout et al. 2001
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 11 · Cited by 274
- Authors
- van den Hout, M., Muris, P., Salemink, E., & Kindt, M.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Venue
- British Journal of Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 121-130
- ISSN
- 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8260
- OpenAlex
- W2162689982
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Keywords
- eye movements, autobiographical memory, memory vividness, emotional memory, memory emotionality, dual-task interference, finger tapping, negative memories, positive memories, memory reconsolidation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Autobiographies as Topic, Eidetic Imagery, Eye Movements, Female, Fingers, Humans, Male, Memory, Movement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review