Cited by 274Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Autobiographical memories become less vivid and emotional after eye movements

van den Hout, Marcel, Muris, Peter, Salemink, Elske, Kindt, Merel·2001·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objectives To test (1) whether eye movements during retrieval of emotional memories are followed by less vividness and less emotionality of future recollections, (2) whether this effect, if present, is stronger than the effects of a control activity (finger tapping), (3) whether the alleged effects of tapping and eye movements are stronger than a no-movement, control condition (mere imagery), (4) whether reductions in vividness and emotionality after eye movements (and finger tapping) are specific to negative memories or also occur in the case of positive memories. Method Sixty healthy volunteers recalled either positive or negative memories and scored the vividness and emotionality of the recollections. Next, memories were recalled whilst the participant was performing rapid eye movements, finger tapping, or not performing a dual task. Then participants were asked to recall the event again and to rate its vividness and emotionality. Results Compared to finger tapping and the no-dual-task condition, recollections after eye movements made future recollections less vivid. After eye movements, but not after the other interventions, negative memories became less negative, and positive memories became less positive. Conclusion The findings show that eye movements not only reduce vividness and emotionality of memories during the eye moving, but also affect future recollections, during which no eye movements are made. Some theoretical explanations are discussed. As to clinical impli…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/014466501163571

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EMDR interventions have generally been found to reduce the vividness and distress of targeted aversive memories compared to recall only.

    “EMDR interventions (including laboratory models of EMDR) have generally been found to reduce the vividness and distress of targeted aversive memories compared to recall only (e.g., Gunter and Bodner 2008;van den Hout et al. 2001), which may also come with memory reappraisal (Gunter and Bodner 2008).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 11 · Cited by 274

Authors
van den Hout, M., Muris, P., Salemink, E., & Kindt, M.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-06
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
121-130
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W2162689982
Cited by
274
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 25
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
eye movements, autobiographical memory, memory vividness, emotional memory, memory emotionality, dual-task interference, finger tapping, negative memories, positive memories, memory reconsolidation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Autobiographies as Topic, Eidetic Imagery, Eye Movements, Female, Fingers, Humans, Male, Memory, Movement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review