The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PTSD symptoms, response to intrusive memories and coping in ambulance service workers
Abstract
Objectives. To examine the relationship of coping strategies and responses to intrusive memories with post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other psychiatric symptoms in ambulance service workers. Method. Fifty‐six ambulance service workers described the most distressing aspects of their work and completed questionnaires designed to measure their coping strategies in dealing with distressing incidents. They also described their intrusive memories of particularly distressing incidents and completed a questionnaire designed to measure their interpretation of these intrusions and their responses to them. In addition, they completed the Post‐traumatic Stress Symptom Scale (PSS; Foa, Riggs, Dancu & Rothbaum, 1993) and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ; Goldberg & Hiller, 1979). Results. Of the participants, 21 met DSM‐III‐R criteria for PTSD, and 22 met GHQ screening criteria for psychiatric symptoms. Wishful thinking and mental disengagement when confronted with critical incidents at work, negative interpretations of intrusive memories, and maladaptive responses to these memories (rumination, suppression and dissociation) correlated with PTSD severity. Conclusion. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that coping strategies and responses to intrusive memories that prevent emotional processing of the distressing event maintain PTSD. They also support Ehlers & Steil's (1995) hypotheses about the role of negative interpretations of post‐traumatic intrusions in PTSD. A substantial subgroup of emergency service personnel may need support in processing distressing incidents at work and may benefit from information that normalizes post‐traumatic symptoms such as intrusions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder
Ehlers, A., & Clark, D. M. (2000) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00123-0 · Cited by 6,147
Self-citationConstructive and unconstructive repetitive thought
Watkins, E. R. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.163 · Cited by 2,421
Tolin, D. F., & Foa, E. B. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.959 · Cited by 2,197
Resilience in the Face of Catastrophe: Optimism, Personality, and Coping in the Kosovo Crisis
Riolli, L., Savicki, V., & Cepani, A. (2002) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02765.x · Cited by 2,166
Repetitive Negative Thinking as a Transdiagnostic Process
Ehring, T., & Watkins, E. R. (2008) · International Journal of Cognitive Therapy · doi:10.1521/ijct.2008.1.3.192 · Cited by 1,172
Metadata
- Authors
- Clohessy, S., & Ehlers, A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 251-265
- ISSN
- 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8260
- OpenAlex
- W2070043657
- Cited by
- 597
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PTSD symptoms, response to intrusive memories and coping in ambulance service workers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/014466599162836
- The paper
- Clohessy, S., & Ehlers, A. (1999). PTSD symptoms, response to intrusive memories and coping in ambulance service workers. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466599162836
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.