Cited by 326Environmental Education and SustainabilitySocial and Intergroup PsychologyAgricultural Innovations and Practices

Integrating social identity theory and the theory of planned behaviour to explain decisions to engage in sustainable agricultural practices.

Fielding, Kelly S., Terry, Deborah J., Masser, Barbara M., Hogg, Michael A.·2008·British Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

The present research integrates core aspects of social identity theory with the theory of planned behaviour to investigate factors influencing engagement in sustainable agricultural practices. Using a two-wave prospective design, two studies were conducted with samples of farmers (N = 609 and N = 259, respectively). At Time 1, a questionnaire survey assessed theory of planned behaviour variables in relation to engaging in riparian zone management (a sustainable agricultural practice). In addition, intergroup perceptions (i.e. relations between rural and urban groups), group norms and group identification were assessed. At Time 2, self-reported behaviour was measured. There was support for the integrated model across both studies. As predicted, past behaviour, attitudes and perceived behavioural control were significant predictors of intentions, and intentions significantly predicted self-reported behaviour. Group norms and intergroup perceptions were also significant predictors of intentions providing support for the inclusion of social identity concepts in the theory of planned behaviour. More supportive group norms were associated with higher intentions, especially for high-group identifiers. In contrast, more negative intergroup perceptions were associated with lower intentions and, unexpectedly, this effect only emerged for low-group identifiers. This suggests that in the context of decisions to engage in riparian zone management, an important sustainable agricultural pra…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/014466607x206792

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More strongly identified group members are more likely to intend to engage in ingroup normative behaviors, such as recycling and sustainable agricultural practices.

    “more strongly identified group members are more likely to intend to engage in ingroup normative behaviors, such as recycling (Terry et al., 1999; White et al., 2009) and sustainable agricultural practices (Fielding et al., 2008b).”
  • Intergroup perceptions (urban versus rural relations) emerged as an additional predictor of farmers' intentions to engage in sustainable natural resource management above and beyond the theory of planned behavior variables.

    “They showed that these intergroup perceptions emerged as an additional predictor above and beyond the TPB variables.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 50 · Cited by 326

Authors
Fielding, K. S., Terry, D. J., Masser, B. M., & Hogg, M. A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Claremont Graduate University (US)
Corresponding author
Fielding, Kelly S.
Venue
British Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
23-48
ISSN
  • 0144-6665 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8309
OpenAlex
W2105830770
Cited by
326
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
24.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Keywords
social identity theory, theory of planned behavior, sustainable agricultural practices, riparian management, farmers, group identification, group norms, intergroup perception, urban-rural relations, intention, perceived behavioral control, attitudes, behavior change
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Agriculture, Attitude, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Theory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Social Identification, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review