The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Illuminating the glass ceiling: The role of organizational culture preferences
Abstract
We present two studies that investigated women's motives to pursue a career in top management. The central hypothesis was that masculine culture preferences are important predictors for career motives. Women were expected to have less masculine preferences than men do, which is assumed to be a determinant of their relative absence in management positions. In Study 1 ( N =327), we investigated gender differences in organizational culture preferences, both in a managerial sample and a sample of non‐managerial professionals in private sector organizations. It was shown that gender differences only existed in the non‐managerial groups, with women showing less masculine culture preferences than men did. In Study 2 ( N =350), we examined the effects of organizational culture preferences on the ambitions of staff employees and middle‐level managers to pursue a career at a top management level in one governmental organization. The results showed that organizational culture preferences were predictive for ambition of non‐managerial employees, but not for that of middle management employees. Overall, women were less ambitious than men, and even ambitious women perceived work‐home conflict as an important barrier to career advancement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Babic, A., & Hansez, I. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618250 · Cited by 184
The Strategies of Turkish Female Managers to Break Glass Ceiling
Kaya, Y., & Tamer, G. (2024) · Sosyoekonomi · doi:10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.02.14 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Vianen, A. E. M., & Fischer, A. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 315-337
- ISSN
- 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8325
- OpenAlex
- W2026598167
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.