Fatal impact? The effects of emotional arousal and weapon presence on police officers' memories for a simulated crime
Abstract
Purpose . (1) To investigate the effects of emotional arousal and weapon presence on the completeness and accuracy of police officers' memories; and (2) to better simulate the experience of witnessing a shooting and providing testimony. Methods . A firearms training simulator was used to present 70 experienced police officers with either a shooting or a domestic dispute scenario containing no weapons. Arousal was measured using both self‐report and physiological indices. Recall for event details was tested after a 10‐minute delay using a structured interview. Identification accuracy was assessed with a photographic line‐up. Results . Self‐report measures confirmed that the shooting induced greater arousal than did the other scenario. Overall, officers' memories for the event were less complete, but more accurate, when they had witnessed the shooting. The recall and line‐up data did not support a weapon focus effect. Conclusions . Police officers' recall performance can be affected both qualitatively and quantitatively by witnessing an arousing event such as a shooting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies in the eyewitness field use single session designs, with encoding and retrieval taking place on the same day, mostly within minutes of each other.
“Many studies in the eyewitness fi eld use single session designs, with encoding and retrieval taking place on the same day -mostly within minutes of each other (e.g., Davis et al., 2019; Hulse & Memon, 2006; Pezdek et al., 2020; Valentine & Mesout, 2009).”
From The effects of acute stress on eyewitness memory: An integrative review for eyewitness researchers (2021) · cites this paper as Hulse & Memon, 2006
Many eyewitness studies implement the stressor at the same time as the to-be-remembered stimulus or event.
“Thus, to replicate the applied context, much of the research implements the stressor at the same time as the to-be-remembered stimulus or event (e.g., most experiments in De ff enbacher et al., 2004; Hulse & Memon, 2006; Morgan et al., 2004).”
From The effects of acute stress on eyewitness memory: An integrative review for eyewitness researchers (2021) · cites this paper as Hulse & Memon, 2006
Cites
The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior
Easterbrook, J. A. (1959) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0047707 · Cited by 3,090 · see citing works
Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass.
Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.466 · Cited by 2,542 · see citing works
Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review
Christianson, S.-Å. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.284 · Cited by 1,112 · see citing works
Cognitive and neural mechanisms of emotional memory
Hamann, S. (2001) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01707-1 · Cited by 1,010 · see citing works
A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory
Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-004-0565-x · Cited by 489 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Over the last three decades, much research has been conducted into the effects of emotional arousal on eyewitness memory (for a review, see Christianson, 1992; see also Deffenbacher, Bornstein, Penrod, & McGorty, 2004 ).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Changes in trauma memory and patterns of posttraumatic stress
Dekel, S., & Bonanno, G. A. (2013) · Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy · doi:10.1037/a0022750 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
The effects of acute stress on eyewitness memory: An integrative review for eyewitness researchers
Marr, C., Sauerland, M., Otgaar, H., Quaedflieg, C. W. E. M., & Hope, L. (2021) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2021.1955935 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“In eyewitness field studies, researchers have used a visit to the London Dungeon (Valentine & Mesout, 2009), interactive police officer training scenarios (Hope et al., 2016; Hulse & Memon, 2006; Stanny & Johnson, 2000), or a military survival school programme (Morgan et al., 2004) as stressors.”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Hulse, L. M., & Memon, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hulse, Lynn M.
- Venue
- Legal and Criminological Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 313-325
- ISSN
- 1355-3259 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8333
- OpenAlex
- W2156954992
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Legal and Criminological Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Keywords
- police officers, eyewitness memory, emotional arousal, weapon focus effect, memory accuracy, lineup identification, domestic disputes, police testimony, physiological arousal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review