One-year follow-up effects of two obesity treatments on psychological well-being and weight
Open accessAbstract
Objectives. The effectiveness of a cognitive and a behavioural treatment for obese binge eaters and obese non‐binge eaters was evaluated at 1‐year follow‐up. Furthermore, we examined the role of weight changes on psychological well‐being at 1‐year follow‐up. Design and method. Participants were reassessed 6 months and 1 year after they had finished a group cognitive treatment or a group behavioural treatment. The outcome measures were; psychological well‐being (concerns about shape, weight and eating, self‐esteem and depression), binge eating, and weight. Results and conclusions. Analyses on the completers' sample revealed that both treatments had a markedly positive and lasting impact on shape concern, weight concern and eating concern, binge eating, self‐esteem, and depression at 1‐year follow‐up. Cognitive treatment was not superior to behavioural treatment on most outcome measures. This might be due to selective drop‐out. Analyses including non‐responders showed that the cognitive treatment was superior on shape, weight and eating concern, and binge eating. The 1‐year follow‐up results for weight‐loss were disappointing. Between pre‐treatment and 1‐year follow‐up participants in the behaviour treatment lost 3.0 kg, while participants in the cognitive treatment lost 0.3 kg. However, participants who gained weight were as successful on changes in psychological well‐being changes as participants who lost weight.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Weight losses in the current programme are generally smaller than those typically reported for CBT programmes.
“These weight losses are generally smaller than those typically reported for CBT programmes.”
From Exploratory randomised controlled trial of a mindfulness-based weight loss intervention for women (2009) · cites this paper as Nauta et al., 2001
CBT programmes generally employ 20-40 hours.
“This contrasts with the 20-40 hours generally employed in CBT programmes (e.g., Nauta et al., 2001; Rapoport et al., 2000).”
From Exploratory randomised controlled trial of a mindfulness-based weight loss intervention for women (2009) · cites this paper as Nauta et al., 2001
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 64
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Blair, S. N., Shaten, J., Brownell, K., Collins, G., & Lissner, L. (1993). Body weight change, all-cause mortality, and case speci c mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 119, 749-757.
- De Zwaan, M., Mitchell, J. E., Seim, H. C., Specker, S. M., Pyle, R. L., Raymond, N. C., & Crosby, R. B. (1994). Eating related and general psychopathology in obese females with binge eating disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 15, 43-52.
- Eldredge, K. L., & Agras, W. S. (1996). Weight and shape overconcern and emotional eating in binge disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 19, 73-82.
- Foreyt, J. P., Brunner, R. L., Goodrick, G. K., Cutter, G., Brownell, K. D., Jeor, S. T. (1995). Psychological correlates of weight uctuation. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17, 253-275.
- Howard, C. E., & Porzelius, L. K. (1999). The role of dieting in binge eating: Etiology and treatment implications. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 25-44.
- Hudson, J. I., Pope, H. G., Wurtman, J., Yurgelun-Todd, D., Mark, S., & Rosenthal, N. E. (1988). Bulimia in obese individuals: Relation to normal weight bulimia. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176, 144-152.
- Marcus, M. D., Smith, D., Santelli, R., & Kaye, W. (1992). Characterization of eating disordered behavior in obese binge eaters. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 12, 249-255.
- Omer, H., & London, P. (1989). Signal and noise in psychotherapy: The role and control of nonspeci c factors. British Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 239-245.
- Rossiter, E. M., Agras, W. S., Telch, C. F., & Bruce, B. (1992). The eating patterns of non-purging bulimic subjects. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 11, 111-120.
- Spitzer, R., Devlin, M., Walsh, B. T., Hasin, D., Wing, R., Marcus, M., Stunkard, A., Wadden, T., Yanovski, S., Agras, S., Mitchell, J., & Nonas, C. (1992). Binge eating disorder: A multisite eld trial of the diagnostic criteria. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 11, 191-203.
- Telch, C. F., Agras, W. S., & Rossiter, E. M. (1988). Binge eating increases with increasing adiposity. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 7, 115-119.
- Wadden, T. A. (1993). Treatment of obesity by moderate and severe restriction: Results of clinical research trials. Annals of Internal Medicine, 119, 688-693.
- Yanovski, S. Z., Nelson, J. E., Dubbert, B. K., & Spitzer, R. L. (1993). Association of binge eating disorder and psychiatric comorbidity in obese subjects. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 1472-1479.
- Authors
- Nauta, H., Hospers, H., & Jansen, A.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Nauta, Helga
- ORCID
- Jansen, Anita
- Venue
- British Journal of Health Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 271-284
- ISSN
- 1359-107X (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8287
- OpenAlex
- W2117354625
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
- Keywords
- obesity treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy, binge eating, psychological well-being, shape concern, weight concern, eating concerns, self-esteem, depression, weight change, long-term follow-up, weight regain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
