The dynamics of illness perceptions: testing assumptions of Leventhal's common-sense model in a pulmonary rehabilitation setting
Open accessAbstract
Objectives . Although Leventhal's common‐sense model (CSM) is proposed to represent a dynamic system, limited research has been conducted to investigate whether and how illness perceptions change. This study tested two hypotheses from the CSM about the dynamics of illness perceptions of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in a pulmonary rehabilitation setting. Design and methods . The study employed a longitudinal design. Patients with COPD ( N =87) who took part in a pulmonary rehabilitation programme filled out the Illness Perception Questionnaire – Revised (IPQ‐R) before and after treatment and rated the degree to which the rehabilitation had led to the achievement of desired outcomes. Clinical variables and quality of life (Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire) data were obtained from medical records. Results . In line with expectations, results showed that, at baseline, longer time since diagnosis was associated to perceptions corresponding with a chronic illness model (longer illness duration, more experienced consequences, less perceived personal controllability), after correction for clinical variables. After completion of the rehabilitation programme, patients who were more convinced that their participation had led to the achievement of desired outcomes were less concerned about the negative consequences of COPD, had stronger perceptions about the variability in symptoms (cyclical timeline) and had stronger perceptions of personal controllability Conclusions . We conclude that, in accordance with Leventhal et al. 's CSM, coping with an illness is a continuous process and the achievement of desired outcomes during treatment is likely to enable patients to adopt a more positive representation of their illness.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scores from the IPQ-R domain 'treatment control' are comparable to a stable population of patients with COPD.
“The scores from the IPQ-R domain 'treatment control' are comparable to a stable population of patients with COPD [39]”
From Can we identify patients with different illness schema following an acute exacerbation of COPD: A cluster analysis (2014) · cites this paper as [39]
Table 4 reports IPQ-R treatment-control scores for patients with COPD before and after pulmonary rehabilitation, providing values for a comparison. But the Participants section does not identify this as a stable COPD population, and the Discussion cautions that removing the curability item makes its scores difficult to compare with other studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 59
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [25]25. Leventhal, H., Nerenz, D., & Steele, D. J. (1984). Illness representations and coping with health threats. In A. Baum, S. E. Taylor, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and health: Social psychological aspects of health (Vol. 4, pp. 219-252). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Authors
- Fischer, M., Scharloo, M., Abbink, J., van 't Hul, A., van Ranst, D., Rudolphus, A., Weinman, J., Rabe, K., & Kaptein, A. A.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
- Rijnlands Revalidatie Centrum (NL)
- Sint Franciscus Gasthuis (NL)
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fischer, Maarten
- Venue
- British Journal of Health Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 887-903
- ISSN
- 1359-107X (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8287
- OpenAlex
- W2015279313
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- illness perception, common sense model of illness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary rehabilitation, illness consequences, symptom variability, disease duration, treatment outcomes, quality of life, coping with chronic illness
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Attitude to Health, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Netherlands, Quality of Life, Patient Satisfaction, Disease Progression, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review