An Overview of Intellectual Disability: Definition, Diagnosis, Classification, and Systems of Supports (12th ed.)
Abstract
The American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD) has published terminology and classification manuals since 1921. Their goals over the last 100 years have been consistent: To fulfill the Association's continued responsibility to be the primary repository of intellectual disability-related research and best practices; to publish a scientific definition of intellectual disability (ID) and its assumptions based on research and one that provides a long, stable definitional history; to provide a singular focus on ID and the lives of people with ID and their families; and to communicate professional standards, ethics, and best practices regarding diagnosis, classification, and planning supports. Consistent with these historical goals, the goals of the 12th edition of the AAIDD manual (Schalock et al. 2021) are to: (a) integrate material published in the 11th edition (Schalock et al., 2010) of the AAIDD manual with post-2010 developments and historical markers; (b) develop a user-friendly manual that combines the theoretical and conceptual thoroughness of a manual with the practical aspects of a user's guide; (c) describe a systematic approach to the diagnosis, optional subgroup classification, and planning of supports for people with intellectual disability based on conceptual models, a clear rationale and purpose, and evidence-based practices; (d) combine current empirical knowledge and best practices into an integrative approach to intellectual disa…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AAIDD recommends a correction of 0.3 points per year since test norms were collected to Full Scale IQ when diagnosing intellectual disability with aged norms.
“Current best practice guidelines recommend that in cases in which an IQ test with aged norms is used as part of a diagnosis of ID, a correction of the full-scale IQ score of 0.3 points per year since the test norms were collected is warranted”
From Wait, Where’s the Flynn Effect on the WAIS-5? (2024) · cites this paper as Schalock et al. 2021
The 1.2 IQ points per decade is lower than the 3 points per decade identified from meta-analyses and sanctioned by AAIDD for ID diagnosis.
“strikingly lower than the 3 points per decade identified from meta-analyses (Pietschnig and Voracek 2015; Trahan et al. 2014) and sanctioned as an adjustment to be made for Wechsler FSIQs in ID diagnosis by AAIDD (Schalock et al. 2021), especially in capital punishment court cases.”
From Wait, Where’s the Flynn Effect on the WAIS-5? (2024) · cites this paper as Schalock et al. 2021
The Flynn effect is incorporated into diagnostic criteria for intellectual disabilities by AAIDD and DSM-5-TR, and in capital punishment cases.
“The FE is incorporated into the diagnostic criteria for intellectual disabilities by the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD), by DSM-5-TR, and in capital punishment cases.”
From Wait, Where’s the Flynn Effect on the WAIS-5? (2024) · cites this paper as Schalock et al. 2021
The AAIDD diagnostic manual and DSM-5-TR require examiners to take practice effects fully into account when diagnosing ID.
“Nonetheless, both the AAIDD diagnostic manual (Schalock et al. 2021) and DSM-5-TR (American Psychiatric Association 2022) make it imperative that examiners take practice effects fully into account when diagnosing ID.”
From Wait, Where’s the Flynn Effect on the WAIS-5? (2024) · cites this paper as Schalock et al. 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Maenner, M. J., Warren, Z., Williams, A. R., Amoakohene, E., Bakian, A. V., Bilder, D. A., Durkin, M. S., Fitzgerald, R. T., Furnier, S. M., Hughes, M. M., et al. (2023) · MMWR. Surveillance Summaries · doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss7202a1 · Cited by 2,706 · see citing works
CARULLA, L. S., REED, G. M., VAEZ‐AZIZI, L. M., COOPER, S., LEAL, R. M., BERTELLI, M., ADNAMS, C., COORAY, S., DEB, S., DIRANI, L. A., et al. (2011) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00045.x · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Flynn effect: A meta-analysis.
Trahan, L. H., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., & Hiscock, M. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037173 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Wait, Where’s the Flynn Effect on the WAIS-5?
Winter, E. L., Trudel, S. M., & Kaufman, A. S. (2024) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence12110118 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schalock, R. L., Luckasson, R., & Tassé, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Hastings College (US)
- University of New Mexico (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schalock, Robert L.
- Venue
- American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-10-26
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 439-442
- ISSN
- 1944-7558 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7515
- OpenAlex
- W3210500589
- Cited by
- 669
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 207 · 2025: 144 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 20 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 64.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Keywords
- definition of intellectual disability, intellectual disability diagnosis, support systems, evidence-based practice, human functioning, professional responsibility, family empowerment, outcome measurement
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Intellectual Disability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review