Development of Deaf Bicultural Identity
Abstract
Based on Epstein's model of self-theory, the importance of providing deaf children with opportunities to develop a solid deaf identity at an early age is discussed. Seven categories of possible identities for deaf people are outlined and the stages of developing a bicultural awareness presented. Case studies detailing these stages are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Holcomb introduced culturally isolated and culturally separate identity categories, where individuals dismiss all interaction with hearing persons or minimise interaction with the hearing community.
“Holcomb (1997:90–91) who is also deaf introduced culturally isolated and culturally separate identity categories in his model.”
From Identity construction among deaf adolescents and young adults: A literature review (2023) · cites this paper as Holcomb 1997
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deaf Epistemology: Deafhood and Deafness
Hauser, P. C., O’Hearn, A., McKee, M., Steider, A., & Thew, D. (2010) · American Annals of the Deaf · doi:10.1353/aad.0.0120 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Identity construction among deaf adolescents and young adults: A literature review
Sekoto, L. V., & Hlayisi, V.-G. (2023) · African Journal of Disability · doi:10.4102/ajod.v12i0.1168 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Holcomb, T. K.
- Venue
- American Annals of the Deaf
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-93
- ISSN
- 1543-0375
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
