Cited by 44Indigenous Studies and EcologyFish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries research

Returning to Selective Fishing through Indigenous Fisheries Knowledge: The Example of K'moda, Gitxaala Territory

Menzies, Charles R., Butler, Caroline F.·2007·The American Indian Quarterly

Abstract

Returning to Selective Fishing through Indigenous Fisheries KnowledgeThe Example of K'moda, Gitxaała Territory Charles R. Menzies (bio) and Caroline F. Butler (bio) The historical abundance of salmon along the west coast of North America has been significantly reduced during the last two centuries of industrial harvest. Commercial fisheries from California to Alaska and points in between have faced clearly documented restrictions on fishing effort and collapse of specific salmon runs.1 Even while salmon runs on some large river systems remain (i.e., the Fraser and Skeena rivers), many smaller runs have all but disappeared. The life histories of many twentieth-century fisheries have been depressingly similar: initial co-existence with indigenous fisheries; emergence of large-scale industrial expansion followed by resource collapse; introduction of limited restrictions on fishing effort, which become increasingly severe, making it hard for fishing communities to survive and to reproduce themselves. Yet for nearly two millennia prior to the industrial extraction of salmon, indigenous peoples maintained active harvests of salmon, which are estimated to have been at or near median industrial harvests during the twentieth century.2 Part of the explanation for salmon stock collapses in the twentieth century resides in the different methodologies used by the indigenous and industrial fisheries. As Joseph E. Taylor comments, "aboriginal and industrial harvests appear statistically sim…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/aiq.2007.0035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inclusion of Indigenous knowledge systems in fisheries research and management has been shown to offer technological shifts that improve fisheries selectivity and sustainability.

    “offer technological shifts that improve fisheries selectivity and sustainability (Menzies & Butler, 2007)”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menzies, C. R., & Butler, C. F.
Venue
The American Indian Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2007
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
441-464
ISSN
  • 0095-182X (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-1828
OpenAlex
W2023066844
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Indian Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
selective fishing, salmon fisheries, Gitxsan, industrial fisheries, traditional resource management, habitat management, fish trade, coho salmon, sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, indigenous self-government

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review