The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 27 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast
Open accessAbstract
Refereed
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
44 Own interpretation · 16 No basis given · 8 Sources not found · 2 Not checked yet
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“FOSS is made visible to wider publics through its extensive use and resignification.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Political intent and subjectivity are indeed noticeably absent in the constitution of the free software and open source movement”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The commons movement, centered on the idea of creating public goods to reinvigorate democratic principles, pragmatically built their licenses and justifications around the already existing practice of FOSS (Bollier 2002, Lessig 2001).”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > The Inadvertent Politics of Contrast
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bollier 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Lessig 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the social practices of free and open software raise the idea that forms property can be antithetical to the principles of free speech”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It works because it recalibrates some of the distinctions and associations between free speech and intellectual property”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“FOSS gives palpable voice to the growing fault lines between expressive and intellectual property rights, especially in the context of digital technologies.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The purported political neutrality of FOSS, inscribed into its technological artifacts through licenses, has facilitated an unfettered circulation of its technologies.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Abstract
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and thus lays the groundwork for its informal political scope”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which differs from more formal political endeavors and new social movements predicated on some political intentionality, direction, or reflexivity or a desire to transform wider social conditions.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“its key role as a catalyst by which to rethink the assumptions of intellectual property rights through its use and inversion.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 44
- It may state two separate claims as one. 13
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“FOSS developers also place an extremely high premium on open technical production as an avenue for expressive activity.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“FOSS developers would suggest that it is unacceptable to claim that FOSS has as one of its goals anti-globalization, or for that matter any political program”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Abstract
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While technical or economic rationalities are often the native explanation for FOSS”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The indiscriminate application of patents to software algorithms and other encryption and copyright laws, such as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), are construed as threats to the free ability of programmers to write source code”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Political affiliation also might deter people from participating on development, thus creating an artificial barrier to entry into this sphere whose ideal and idealized form is a transparent meritocracy.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to hackers, the fact that anyone can use FOSS and that it can be directed towards economic, political, and personal ends is a positive side-effect of openness; they consider it a testament to the power of a neutral political commitment.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While program-ming is considered a transparent, neutral, highly controllable realm for thought and expression where production results in immediate gratification and something useful, politics tend to be seen by programmers as buggy, mediated, and tainted action clouded by ideology that is not productive of much of anything while it insidiously works against true forms of free thought.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Put simply, political claims outside of software subtract from, tarnish, and censor the sphere for the free circulation of thought, action, and expression.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Programmers describe their craft as an activity that allows for personal unrestricted forms of creativity, expression, learning, and action, enacted through a medium, the digital computer, and preferably interfaced through a transparent and flexible, technical environment (like UNIX).”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the opposite side of the spectrum, leftist media websites such as Indymedia.netrun almost entirely on FOSS while its activists adore it for its subversive, anticapitalist potentialities.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > The Inadvertent Politics of Contrast
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Downloading music and watching movies, socializing in chat rooms, playing highly addictive mutli-player games, creating software libre, meeting future girlfriends and wives on chat channels, reading your news daily online-all these activities contribute to a strong practical orientation and embodied disposition that the activity of communicating on and creating through a computer is a space of”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“You can't tweak politics in an elegant and creative way to achieve something immediately gratifying, and thus it goes against everything programmers think and love about computing.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which hackers and programmers have only recently come to conceptualize as a form of communication worthy of the broadest protections afforded by First Amendment law.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A political tag is also perceived to curtail one's personal freedom for deciding how to best interpret this domain of activity-a form of censorship and thus a highly polluted association to conjure.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“FOSS has not only transformed the dynamics of software development but is also shifting understandings of the appropriate use of intellectual property instruments and the scope of free speech protections.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“FOSS has not only transformed the dynamics of software development but is also shifting understandings of the appropriate use of intellectual property instruments and the scope of free speech protections.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a cultural positioning that simultaneously is informed by the computing techniques and outwardly expresses and thus constitutes hacker values.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“All provisions in these documents work through a logic of non-discrimination as to achieve universality.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Free Software Definition
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Debian Free Software Guidelines
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Open Source Definition
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“the goal of which is to enact a universal sphere for the flourishing of free forms of action and thought.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Free Software Definition
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Debian Free Software Guidelines
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Open Source Definition
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The moral and semiotic load of free software is a commitment to prevent limiting the freedom of others.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Free Software Definition
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Debian Free Software Guidelines
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Open Source Definition
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“political denial is culturally orchestrated through a rearticulation of free speech principles”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“In these charters, freedom underscores an individual's right to create, use, and distribute software in a manner that will allow exactly the same for others, so long as license rules are followed”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Free Software Definition
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Debian Free Software Guidelines
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Open Source Definition
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Within this purview, source code, the line-by-line directions that programmers write to make software applications, is treated implicitly and explicitly as a form of speech.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Free Software Definition
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Debian Free Software Guidelines
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Open Source Definition
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Perhaps most significant is that FOSS enjoins others to become part of its performance in various ways: use of FOSS artifacts and licenses, participation in projects, reflection of the larger meaning of collaboration, and the reuse (and reconfigurations) of its licenses for other non-technological objects, such as college courseware, music, books, and movies.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > The Inadvertent Politics of Contrast
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite this incipient cognizance of the legal threats to free speech, what grows out of this particular life world of intense, lifelong programming and networked sociality is an overt aesthetic dislike for politics and a culturally embodied experience of freedom that conceptually shuns politics.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to this productive ambiguity that resists political affiliation of left, right, and liberal, FOSS has circulated extensively, though the relevance of freedom and openness mutates along the way of its excursions”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > The Inadvertent Politics of Contrast
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In essence, computing is understood and experienced (sometimes reflectively, other times implicitly) by FOSS hackers as the very micro-sphere for the unfettered circulation of thought, expression, and action that freedom within the macro-sphere FOSS seeks to achieve through licenses.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“an objectification buttressed within a hacker public sphere and as a political vector to make claims against the aggressive application of intellectual property restrictions.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“In other words, it reminds us that free speech, privacy, and property right have complex histories born from material and discursive struggles over meaning, even if such principles are socially construed as beyond the turmoil of history.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bollinger and Stone 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While relevant in other ways, it is analytically deficient to analyze the free speech elements of free software as an example of these otherwise cogent analyses-that is, as an augmentation or verification of an already existing and mystified American liberal tradition.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Also to simply assert that the free speech character of FOSS is an expression of liberal values occludes key questions of investigation”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“FOSS, among many other things, functions as a form of critical ethnography writ large.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > The Inadvertent Politics of Contrast
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thousands upon thousands of developers laboring to make software libre provides potent critiques and viable alternatives since it is realized by the social performance of collective labor and licenses that others can and now do use.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > The Inadvertent Politics of Contrast
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The technological potential for unlimited programmable capabilities melds with what is seen as the expansive ability for programmers to create.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For programmers, computing in a dual sense, as a technology and as an activity, becomes a total realm for the freedom of creation and expression.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As a number of critical scholars argue, forms of political neutrality are immanent to free speech doctrine (Brown 1995, Fish 1999, Marcuse 1965, MacKinnon 1993, Passavat 2002).”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Brown 1995 source
- Not matchedcites Fish 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Marcuse 1965
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each group situates it in ways that empowers and legitimates their own aspirations, but through their particular efforts they extend FOSS to wider publics.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > The Inadvertent Politics of Contrast
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, the pragmatics of computing is a means by which to typify political activity as distasteful, unappealing, and ineffective.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And though there are distinct imaginaries grafted onto FOSS, certain implicit political messages within the labor and law of free and open source software also gain visible prominence.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > The Inadvertent Politics of Contrast
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These critiques treat decontextualized neutrality primarily as ideological scaffolding that justifies a politics of individual liberties over those of structural equality.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Brown 1995 source
- Not matchedcites Fish 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Marcuse 1965
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The freedom of free software, while influenced by wider liberal sensibilities, is fundamentally shaped by the pragmatics of programming and the social context of Internet use.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Actualized labor in practice undermines current theories of labor in the law whose nature is to pose singular models for the proper relationship between legal means and ends.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > The Inadvertent Politics of Contrast
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The feature of critique that arises through the cultural struggle to recreate and redefine meanings and associations, I have come to learn, is much more ephemeral than the supposed ephemera of virtual social spaces.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Through FOSS' visibility, circulation, and use, the juridical understanding of free speech is shifting while some of the ingrained assumptions of intellectual property law have already been partially destabilized, the wider effect of which has been to open up a social space for new legal possibilities.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While many hackers might think you can't tweak politics in an elegant and creative way to achieve something immediate and useful, Richard Stallman, the mastermind behind the copyleft, showed through a clever legal hack that politics can be gratifying and indeed very productive.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > The Inadvertent Politics of Contrast
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The journalistic, popular, and native narrative retelling of the rise and importance of new practices or political sensibilities often don't integrate this moment of cultural defamiliarization, focusing instead on the rubric of great men and their ideas or explanation through unintended consequences that may not have been part of its genesis.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“FOSS, I have argued, is one local instantiation of liberal values, a rearticulation centered on reposing the relationship between intellectual property and free speech law by redirecting the use of licenses to protect expressive activity.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“FOSS sensibilities of freedom and the growing hacker assertion that source code is speech, largely regimented as politically neutral through liberal values, are also rooted in methodologies, values, and techniques constituted around the act of writing code and expressed visibly in a wider public social sphere of hacking.”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Conclusion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
The practices and statements of FOSS hackers are culturally significant and can be read as expressing a coherent set of values.
“The witnessable set of practices, such as collaborative production and the creative deployment of licenses, has become a social point of contrast”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > ENDNOTES
“see Gray (1996) in his review of liberal political thought”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > References
“18. Gray, John. 1986. Liberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > The Inadvertent Politics of Contrast
“(cf.Benedict 1959, Mead 1928, Marcus and Fisher 1986, Mauss 1967, Sahlins 1976)”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > References
“30. Mauss, Marcel. 1954. The Gift. London: Cohen and West.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > The Inadvertent Politics of Contrast
“Marcus and Fisher 1986”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > References
“27. Marcus, George E. and Michael Fischer. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > ENDNOTES
“(see Betting 1996;Boyle 1996;Coombe 1998;Lessig 1999Lessig , 2001))”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > References
“4. Betting, Ronald. 1986. Copyrighting Culture. Boulder: Westview Press.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > Political Agnosticism
“(Brown 1995, Fish 1999, Marcuse 1965, MacKinnon 1993, Passavat 2002)”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > References
“17. Fish, Stanley. 1994. There's No Such Thing as Free Speech and It's a Good Thing Too.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > ENDNOTES
“(see Graves 1994, Brush and Stabinsky 1995, and Shiva 1997)”
§ The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast > References
“19. Greaves, Tom. 1994. Intellectual Property Rights for Indigenous People: A Sourcebook.”
Citations
Cites
Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance
(1986) · World Development · doi:10.1016/0305-750x(86)90141-5 · Cited by 9,858
Powers of freedom: reframing political thought
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-3035 · Cited by 5,618
Academic capitalism: politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-3451 · Cited by 3,912
States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity
Brown, W. (1995) · doi:10.1515/9780691201399 · Cited by 3,486
Bakhtin, M., & Iswolsky, H. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429355363-6 · Cited by 3,427
(1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,259
BENEDICT, R. F. (1936) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.2307/2262185 · Cited by 2,097
The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit
Kaplan, B., & Turkle, S. (1986) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3105353 · Cited by 1,724
Spirits of Resistance and Capitalist Discipline: Factory Women in Malaysia
McGee, T. (1988) · Pacific Affairs · doi:10.2307/2759343 · Cited by 1,565
Hackers — Heroes of the computer revolution
(1986) · Computer Law & Security Report · doi:10.1016/0267-3649(86)90036-1 · Cited by 1,440
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- [4]4. Betting, Ronald. 1986. Copyrighting Culture. Boulder: Westview Press.
- [11]11. Comaroff, Jean. 1985. Body of Power Spirit of Resistance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- [14]14. Coombe, Rosemary J. 1998. The Cultural Life of Intellectual Property. Durham: Duke University Press.
- [18]18. Gray, John. 1986. Liberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- [22]22. Kelty, Christopher. 2000. "Anthropology Monsters, Faces of the Gift." Paper presented AAA conference November 15-19.
- [25]25. MacKinnon, Catherine. 1993. Only Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- [27]27. Marcus, George E. and Michael Fischer. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- [29]29. Martin, Randy. 1998. Critical Moves: Dance Studies in Theory and Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
- [33]33. Nimmer, Melvin. 1970. "Does Copyright Abridge First Amendment Guaranties of Free Speech and the Press?" UCLA Law Review 17:1181-86.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 211
OPEN SOURCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE OPEN JOURNAL SYSTEMS SOFTWARE PROJECT
Quint-Rapoport, M. (2011) · Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · Cited by 4
THESE GREAT URBANIST GAMES: NEW BABYLON AND SECOND LIFE
(2008) · doi:10.1080/17493460902942204 · Cited by 4
When audit confronts blockchain
Pimentel, E., Boulianne, E., & Spence, C. (2024) · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-12-2023-6768 · Cited by 4
Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS)
(2007) · doi:10.23987/sts.55209 · Cited by 3
Openness in Scholarship: A return to core values?
(2017) · doi:10.59350/bc3bz-kye05 · Cited by 3
Opening Up The Tools For Doing Science: The Case Of The Global Open Science Hardware MovementPreprint
Arancio, J. (2020) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/46keb · Cited by 3
Repurposing the hacker. Three temporalities of recuperation
Delfanti, A., & Söderberg, J. (2015) · Cited by 2
Atoms Want to Be Free Too! Expanding the Critique of Intellectual Property to Physical Goods
Söderberg, J., & Daoud, A. (2012) · tripleC Communication Capitalism & Critique Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society · doi:10.31269/vol10iss1pp66-76 · Cited by 2
Algo-Demokratie – Macht der Technik, Ohnmacht der Demokratie?
Boehme-Neßler, V. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-57485-0_4 · Cited by 2
01010000 01001100 01000001 01011001: Play Elements in Computer Programming.
(2013) · Cited by 2
Local and Not-So-Local Exchanges
Hess, D. J. (2013) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822395867-007 · Cited by 2
Retiring the Network Spokesman
Chan, A. S. (2007) · Science & Technology Studies · doi:10.23987/sts.55213 · Cited by 2
Ethnographic Approaches to the World Social Forum
Conway, J. M. (2013) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822395867-012 · Cited by 6
(2008) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822389002-014 · Cited by 2
de Winkel, T. (2023) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.33540/1921 · Cited by 5
An open source platform for developing mobile learning experiences
Gagnon, D. (2010) · Cited by 1
(2008) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822389002-003 · Cited by 1
The Interaction of the Technical and the Social
(2013) · doi:10.3917/csp.015.0227 · Cited by 1
Plots of Intelligence Surveillance - Dramas of Institutional IdentificationPreprint
Miscione, G. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2617302 · Cited by 1
Humanising the smart city: Co-creation redefined in pursuit of systemic change
Cioaca, I. A. (2020) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.135971 · Cited by 1
Taillandier, A. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/1aeb18c0zdf4az43e0z89b6zb5ef0e34c2db · Cited by 1
(2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139031127.019 · Cited by 1
Hacktivism and Habermas: Online Protest as Neo-Habermasian Counterpublicity
Houghton, T. J. (2010) · UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · doi:10.26021/4788 · Cited by 1
Digital Despotism and Aristotle on the Despotic Master–Slave Relation
Bhorat, Z. (2023) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-023-00675-y · Cited by 1
The Transnational Struggle for Information Freedom
STERPKA, M. K. (2013) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822395867-013 · Cited by 1
Ferraro, F., & Torrents, J. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_360-1 · Cited by 1
9. Transformative Ethnography and the World Social Forum. Theories and Practices of Transformation
Caruso, G. (2020) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780822395867-012 · Cited by 1
de Rosnay, M. D. (2016) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v21i12.7117 · Cited by 1
Doctoral Colloquium -- Open-Source Culture
Leavitt, A. (2015) · doi:10.1145/2685553.2699325 · Cited by 1
Hajikon: Bodily Encounters and Dangerous Games
Galbraith, P. W. (2021) · doi:10.16993/bbn.f · Cited by 1
The Coming of Augmented Property: A Constructivist Lesson for the Critics of Intellectual Property
Söderberg, J. A. (2015) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137473905_10 · Cited by 1
(2017) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822373919-008
(2022) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/13466.003.0012
The subject supposed to design
Tie, W. (2016) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1127388
Open Source in Higher Education: Towards an Understanding of Networked Universities
Quint-Rapoport, M. (2012) · Policy Futures in Education · doi:10.2304/pfie.2012.10.3.315
(2018) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822372981-011
(2018) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822372981-010
Oh, Y. J. (2013) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
4. Hacking Rules: Facilitating Inclusivity in Hacker- and Makerspaces
Richterich, A. (2022) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9789048550401-006
Galbraith, P. W. (2021) · doi:10.16993/bbn.a
7. Coordinating Collaborations
Kelty, C. M. (2008) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822389002-010
Abbing, R. R. (2026) · doi:10.24834/isbn.9789178778065
(2018) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822372981-001
INKLUSION I DET DIGITALE FÆLLESSKAB
Skovgaard, M., & Bendixen, S. E. (2021) · Tidsskriftet Antropologi · doi:10.7146/ta.vi82.128904
Moving Images: Affection by Design
Galbraith, P. W. (2021) · doi:10.16993/bbn.d
Smajda, J. (2011) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota)
Transformative Ethnography and the World Social Forum
Caruso, G. (2013) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822395867-010
Navigating Pandemic Crises: Encountering the Digital Commons
Schoonmaker, S. (2023) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027642231155360
Industrial Relations and an Introduction to STS in Practice
(2018) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822372981-006
Conclusion: A World that’s Ending: Do You Love Me?
Galbraith, P. W. (2021) · doi:10.16993/bbn.g
Digital organizing outside organizations, WikiLeaks’ whistle and Snowden’s flute
Miscione, G. (2023) · puntOorg International Journal · doi:10.19245/25.05.pij.8.2.1
(2018) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822372981-004
Ferraro, F., & Torrents, J. (2018) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_360
(2018) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822372981-014
(2018) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822372981-008
(2008) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822389002-009
(2008) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822389002-015
Coding the Subaltern: A Cultural Study of Postcoloniality in the Information Age
(2008) · DigiNole (Florida State University)
Imaginary Sex and Crime in Japan: A Brief History
Galbraith, P. W. (2021) · doi:10.16993/bbn.b
(2013) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822395867-017
Murillo, L. F. R. (2021) · The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology · doi:10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2487
Coming of Age in Akihabara: Imaginary Sex in Public
Galbraith, P. W. (2021) · doi:10.16993/bbn.c
Kelty, C. M. (2008) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822389002-007
Kelty, C. M. (2008) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822389002-006
(2018) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822372981-013
(2024) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/14907.003.0015
(2018) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822372981-005
Galbraith, P. W. (2021) · doi:10.16993/bbn.h
“If We Succeed, We Will Disappear”
(2008) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822389002-012
(2018) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822372981-007
2. From Free Software to Open Source
Ridgway (2026) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0528.02
Appendix: Notes on Perverse Methodology
Galbraith, P. W. (2021) · doi:10.16993/bbn.i
O’Neil, M., Toupin, S., & Pentzold, C. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119537151.ch30
(2008) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822389002-016
Swinnen, A., Kluveld, A., & van de Vall, R. (2022) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv2rcnqpt · Cited by 1
Methods for Following Chemicals
(2018) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822372981-003
(2018) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822372981-009
Algo-democracy. Power of Technology, Powerlessness of Democracy?
Boehme-Neßler, V. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34556-3_4
Metadata
- Authors
- Coleman, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Coleman, Gabriella
- ORCID
- Coleman, Gabriella
- Venue
- Anthropological Quarterly
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 507-519
- ISSN
- 0003-5491 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-1518
- OpenAlex
- W1981981344
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 13.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Anthropological Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- eVols (University of Hawaii) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Copyright and Intellectual Property
- Keywords
- free and open source software, contrast, political neutrality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
