Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Abuses of Memory: Reflections on the Memory Boom in Anthropology

Berliner, David C·2005·Anthropological Quarterly
DOI 10.1353/anq.2005.0001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/anq.2005.0001

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Berliner, D. C.
Venue
Anthropological Quarterly
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2005-12
Volume
78
Issue
1
Pages
197-211
ISSN
  • 0003-5491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-1518
DOI
10.1353/anq.2005.0001
OpenAlex
W2086724751
Cited by
288
References
46
FWCI
49.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Abuses of Memory: Reflections on the Memory Boom in Anthropology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/anq.2005.0001
The paper
Berliner, D. C. (2005). The Abuses of Memory: Reflections on the Memory Boom in Anthropology. Anthropological Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2005.0001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.