The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Culture and the State in Late Chosŏn Korea
Abstract
Investigating the late-16th century through to the 19th century, this work looks at the shifting boundaries between the Chosen state and the adherents of Confucianism, Buddhism, Christianity and popular religions. Seeking to define the meaning and constitutive elements of the hegemonic group and a particular marginalized community in this Confucian state, the contributors argue that the power of each group and the space it occupied were determined by a dynamic interaction of ideology, governmental policies and the group's self-perceptions. Collectively, the volume counters the static view of the Korean Confucian state, elucidates its relationship to the wider Confucian community and religious groups, and suggests views of the complex way in which each negotiated and adjusted its ideology and practices in response to the state's activities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Another idea, of China as the center of civilization and hence the source of orthodoxy, was ''the theory of differentiating between civilized and uncivilized'' ( hwairon 華 夷 論 ), that was widely accepted in Korea of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.”
From The Re-emergence of Chosŏn Buddhism in the 17th Century: A Question of Institutional Development and Legitimation (2019) · cites this paper as Kim Haboush 1999
In the citing paper
“Thus, particularly with the conquest of Ming China by the Manchus, the notion of hwairon took on a greater significance and urgency as an effort to maintain and guard the source of orthodoxy. 42”
From The Re-emergence of Chosŏn Buddhism in the 17th Century: A Question of Institutional Development and Legitimation (2019) · cites this paper as Kim Haboush 1999
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Decline of Son Preference in South Korea: The Roles of Development and Public Policy
Chung, W., & Gupta, M. D. (2007) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00196.x · Cited by 306
The Way to Become a Female Sage: Im Yunjidang’s Confucian Feminism
Kim, S. (2014) · Journal of the History of Ideas · doi:10.1353/jhi.2014.0026 · Cited by 45
Politics, Commerce and Construction of Chinese ‘Otherness’ in Korea: Open Port Period (1876–1910)
Choi, S. (2008) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230591622_8 · Cited by 18
The Origins of the Public Sphere and Civil Society
Koo, J. (2007) · Social Science History · doi:10.1017/s0145553200013791 · Cited by 18
Conversion Studies, Pastoral Counseling, and Cultural Studies: Engaging and Embracing a New Paradigm
Rambo, L. R. (2009) · Pastoral Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11089-009-0202-1 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Haboush, J. K., & Deuchler, M.
- Published
- 1999
- OpenAlex
- W1520214224
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Keywords
- Confucian state, Confucianism, Buddhism, Christianity, folk religion, state-religion relations, hegemonic groups, marginalized communities, ideology, public policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review