CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0Historical, Religious, and Philosophical StudiesMedieval Literature and HistoryMedieval European Literature and History

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cathar "Time-Focused Dualism"—An Argument for the Eastern Origins of Catharism

Open access
Czarnecki, Piotr·2021·The Catholic Historical Review
DOI 10.1353/cat.2021.0032
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The starting point of this article is the conception of Bernard Hamilton from 1974 assuming that the Bogomil Church of Drugunthia was formed under Paulician influence. Its radically dualistic doctrine was later accepted by some Cathars described in the sources as belonging to the Drugunthian order (ordo Drugonthiae). The article attempts to verify this concept through doctrinal analysis, and to answer the question whether distinctive features of the Paulician doctrine can be found in the teachings of the Cathars of the Drugunthian order. Analysis of sources of various provenance-polemical, inquisitorial and Cathar (the so called "Manichaean Treatise")-show clearly that traces of specific Paulician "time-focused dualism" can be found in Cathar teachings, which confirms Hamilton's conception and is an important argument for the Eastern origins of Catharism

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/cat.2021.0032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Related

Metadata

Authors
Czarnecki, P.
Corresponding author
Czarnecki, Piotr
ORCID
Czarnecki, Piotr
Venue
The Catholic Historical Review
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2021
Volume
107
Issue
4
Pages
482-502
ISSN
  • 0008-8080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-0708
DOI
10.1353/cat.2021.0032
OpenAlex
W4205422480
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • The Catholic Historical Review (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Medieval European Literature and History
Keywords
Catharism, Bogomils, dualism, medieval heresy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review