The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Our Pain, their Heritage Project: From the Palmyra Moment to Violence and the City
Abstract
Cultural heritage sites in Syria have been weaponized, targeted, bombed, looted, and destroyed. Since the start of the Syrian Revolution in March 2011, images of destruction, as in the case of Palmyra with its celebrity status, have attracted significant attention from archaeologists, architects, and journalists to academics, politicians, and art curators. This interest led to the emergence of an "industry" focused on the protection and reconstruction of cultural heritage sites during times of violence, war, and conflict. Very often, cultural heritage projects have failed to engage with the Syrian people, turning our pain and trauma into a "heritage project." Furthermore, most of these projects have focused on selective monumental heritage sites, while neglecting the inhabitants in and around these sites. They also failed to look at the cities as a living urban whole with their narrowed focus on the monumental heritage site. In this paper therefore, I ask two questions. First, how has Palmyra been used and abused as a stage for global performances by various foreign powers? And second, how can we convert the one-off traumatic rupture of cultural heritage sites and its cinematic image of destruction, as in Palmyra in 2015, into an understanding of slow and fast violence that takes place in cities?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As the Syrian-British architect Azzouz (2022) puts it, 'Our pain, their heritage project' has been a key feature and an overarching framework of cultural heritage in the Arab region; I add that it applies to the knowledge produced about the past remains in conflict and post-conflict contexts by foreign scholars.”
From Time to decolonise: ‘If not now’, then when? (2024) · cites this paper as Azzouz, 2022
Citations
Cited by
Time to decolonise: ‘If not now’, then when?
Munawar, N. A. (2024) · Journal of Social Archaeology · doi:10.1177/14696053231224321 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Azzouz, A.
- Venue
- Change Over Time
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 162-180
- ISSN
- 2153-0548
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Our Pain, their Heritage Project: From the Palmyra Moment to Violence and the City. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/cot.2022.0005
- The paper
- Azzouz, A. (2022). Our Pain, their Heritage Project: From the Palmyra Moment to Violence and the City. Change Over Time. https://doi.org/10.1353/cot.2022.0005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.