Cited by 293Indigenous and Place-Based EducationIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsIndigenous Cultures and Socio-Education

Our Own Liberation: Reflections on Hawaiian Epistemology

Open access
Meyer, Manulani Aluli·2001·The Contemporary Pacific

Abstract

As the Hawaiian political and cultural movement continues to grow, issues of re presentation, power, and control are being critiqued—now by Hawaiian minds. In this essay I look at the fundamentals of Hawaiian epistemology and begin to link them with the educational re f o rm now underway in Hawai'i. With the guidance of twenty mentors, I outline seven epistemological categories that begin to solidify a distinct way in which to view teaching, learning, intellect, and rigor. These categories, now struggling to be useful in the Hawaiian Charter School movement, will inevitably also serve as a way to critique the current colonial system in Hawaiian language immersion, spotlight the oppression embedded in well-meant content and performance standards, and highlight the hidden curriculum of assimilation and the acultural assumptions in pedagogy that exist in Hawai'i's colonial schools. This outline of a Hawaiian philosophy of knowledge expands, invigorates, and redefines ideas of empiricism, intellectual rigor, and knowledge priorities—all through Hawaiian ontological lenses. Like any definition of culture put forth by indigenous practitioners and scholars, it pushes the envelope of what it means to think, exist, and struggle as a nonmainstream "other," and as it details the liberation found in identity, it must also, inevitably, outline the systems that deter its full blossoming.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/cp.2001.0024

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyer, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Hawaii System (US)
Corresponding author
Meyer, Manulani Aluli
Venue
The Contemporary Pacific
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2001-03
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
124-148
ISSN
  • 1043-898X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-9464
OpenAlex
W2046331519
Cited by
293
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
12.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Contemporary Pacific/The contemporary Pacific (Online) (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education
Keywords
colonial education, hidden curriculum, assimilation, indigenous knowledge, epistemology, intellectual rigor, representation and power

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review