Implementing a Community Engagement Model to Develop a Community-Driven Oral Health Intervention
Abstract
Background Using community-engaged research may result in interventions that reduce infant oral health disparities in underserved populations. Objective Develop community partnerships to create a sustainable infant oral health program that meets specific community-identified needs and provides an interprofessional education experience. Methods Partnering with the Homewood Community Engagement Center, researchers engaged and surveyed key community partners to assess the need for an infant oral health invention. Lessons learned Community-identified organizing principles and barriers became the framework for, "Healthy Teeth, Healthy Me," a community-driven infant oral health program. Barriers, like access to care, were addressed with community-specific solutions like agreements with local dental clinical for referrals. Conclusions Community partnerships can be leveraged to develop oral health programs that fit specific community needs and provide resources to families at greatest risk for child dental caries. Community engagement can be used to modify the intervention to meet oral health needs of other vulnerable communities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Healthy Teeth, Healthy Me intervention shows how community partnerships can shape oral health interventions around local barriers, priorities, and organizing principles.
“The Healthy Teeth, Healthy Me intervention shows how community partnerships can shape oral health interventions around local barriers, priorities, and organizing principles (Chew et al 2024).”
From New Frontiers for Implementation Science in Oral Health: Digital and Equity-Driven Pathways (2026) · cites this paper as Chew et al 2024
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New Frontiers for Implementation Science in Oral Health: Digital and Equity-Driven Pathways
Bomfim, R. A., Talla, P. K., & Nicolau, B. F. (2026) · JDR Clinical & Translational Research · doi:10.1177/23800844261466250
- Authors
- Chew, C., Rosen, D., Watson, K., D'Alesio, A., Ellerbee, D., Gloster, J., Tharp-Gilliam, S., Beasley, T., & Burgette, J. M.
- Venue
- Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2024-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-77
- ISSN
- 1557-0541 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-055X
- OpenAlex
- W4392957578
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Progress in community health partnerships (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Service-Learning and Community Engagement
- Keywords
- community-engaged research, infant oral health, oral health disparities, community partnerships, community-based intervention, interprofessional education, dental caries prevention, access to dental care, underserved populations, community needs assessment
- MeSH terms
- Community-Institutional Relations, Dental Caries, Health Promotion, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Infant, Oral Health, Program Development, Community-Based Participatory Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review