The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Premediation
Abstract
Premediation Richard Grusin Remediation and Premediation In our 1999 book Remediation: Understanding New Media, Jay Bolter and I defined "remediation" as the double logic according to which media (particularly but not exclusively digital media) refashion prior media forms.1 In response to the question of what was new about digital media at the end of the twentieth century, we proposed that these media were new precisely because of the ways in which they refashioned older media. Specifically, we examined the ways in which such media as computer graphics, video games, virtual reality, and the World Wide Web define themselves by borrowing from, paying homage to, critiquing, and refashioning their predecessors, principally television, film, photography, and painting, but also print. Video and computer games, we argued, remediate film by styling themselves as "interactive movies," incorporating standard Hollywood cinematic techniques. Virtual reality remediates film as well as perspective painting. Digital photography remediates the analog photograph. The Web absorbs and refashions almost every previous visual and textual medium, including television, film, radio, and print. Furthermore, we argued that older media remediate newer ones within the same media economy. The traditional Hollywood cinema, for example, has responded to the challenge of digital media in a variety of different ways: by employing computer graphics in otherwise conventional films, by creating films entirely w…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is a body of work in media and communication studies that considers how media (images, templates, narratives) are used to ' premediate ' (Brown and Hoskins 2010; Erll 2008; Grusin 2004, 2010; Hoskins and O ' Loughlin 2009) what is to come, to help make the future plausible and thus more manageable and controllable.”
From AI and memory (2024) · cites this paper as Grusin 2004
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hoskins, A. (2024) · Memory, Mind & Media · doi:10.1017/mem.2024.16 · Cited by 64
“…in media and communication studies that considers how media (images, templates, narratives) are used to ‘ premediate ’ (Brown and Hoskins 2010; Erll 2008; Grusin 2004, 2010; Hoskins and O ’ Loughlin 2009) what is to come, to help make the future plausible and thus more manageable and controllable.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Grusin, R. A.
- Corresponding author
- Grusin, Richard A.
- ORCID
- Grusin, Richard A.
- Venue
- Criticism
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-39
- ISSN
- 0011-1589 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-0342
- OpenAlex
- W4232689480
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 18.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Criticism (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Visual Culture and Art Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Technology, and Culture
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Keywords
- premediation, remediation, digital media, media economics, media convergence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review