Cited by 62Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementGlobal Health Care IssuesHealth disparities and outcomes

The exceptionally high life expectancy of Costa Rican nonagenarians

Open access
Rosero-Bixby, Luis·2008·Demography

Abstract

Robust data from a voter registry show that Costa Rican nonagenarians have an exceptionally high live expectancy. Mortality at age 90 in Costa Rica is at least 14% lower than an average of 13 high-income countries. This advantage increases with age by 1% per year. Males have an additional 12% advantage. Age-90 life expectancy for males is 4.4 years, one-half year more than any other country in the world. These estimates do not use problematic data on reported ages, but ages are computed from birth dates in the Costa Rican birth-registration ledgers. Census data con rm the exceptionally high survival of elderly Costa Ricans, especially males. Comparisons with the United States and Sweden show that the Costa Rican advantage comes mostly from reduced incidence of cardiovascular diseases, coupled with a low prevalence of obesity, as the only available explanatory risk factor. Costa Rican nonagenarians are survivors of cohorts that underwent extremely harsh health conditions when young, and their advantage might be just a heterogeneity in frailty effect that might disappear in more recent cohorts. The availability of reliable estimates for the oldest-old in low- income populations is extremely rare. These results may enlighten the debate over how harsh early-life health conditions affect older-age mortality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/dem.0.0011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 62

Authors
Rosero-Bixby, L.
Affiliations
Centro Centroamericano de Población, Universidad de Costa Rica, Apartado 2060, San Jose, Costa Rica
Venue
Demography
Published
2008-08-01
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
673-691
ISSN
  • 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-7790
OpenAlex
W2132352020
Cited by
62
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Demography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Investigative News in Education (Universidad de Costa Rica) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Princeton University
  • University of Michigan
  • Wellcome Trust (072406)
  • Universidad de Costa Rica
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Global Health Care Issues
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
nonagenarians, life expectancy, oldest old, cardiovascular disease, obesity, frailty, cohort heterogeneity, sex differences in mortality, Costa Rica
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Cause of Death, Costa Rica, Female, Humans, Life Expectancy, Male, Mortality, Cohort Studies, Survival Analysis, Developed Countries, Censuses, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review