The exceptionally high life expectancy of Costa Rican nonagenarians
Open accessAbstract
Robust data from a voter registry show that Costa Rican nonagenarians have an exceptionally high live expectancy. Mortality at age 90 in Costa Rica is at least 14% lower than an average of 13 high-income countries. This advantage increases with age by 1% per year. Males have an additional 12% advantage. Age-90 life expectancy for males is 4.4 years, one-half year more than any other country in the world. These estimates do not use problematic data on reported ages, but ages are computed from birth dates in the Costa Rican birth-registration ledgers. Census data con rm the exceptionally high survival of elderly Costa Ricans, especially males. Comparisons with the United States and Sweden show that the Costa Rican advantage comes mostly from reduced incidence of cardiovascular diseases, coupled with a low prevalence of obesity, as the only available explanatory risk factor. Costa Rican nonagenarians are survivors of cohorts that underwent extremely harsh health conditions when young, and their advantage might be just a heterogeneity in frailty effect that might disappear in more recent cohorts. The availability of reliable estimates for the oldest-old in low- income populations is extremely rare. These results may enlighten the debate over how harsh early-life health conditions affect older-age mortality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nicoya had an aging tendency ratio of 117.03 in 2020.
“Despite the paucity of data regarding nonagenarians and centenarians, Nicoya’s aging tendency ratio was 117.03 in 2020 [172,173] (Table 1).”
From The Power of Environment: A Comprehensive Review of the Exposome's Role in Healthy Aging, Longevity, and Preventive Medicine-Lessons from Blue Zones and Cilento (2025) · cites this paper as [173]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Rosero-Bixby, L.
- Affiliations
- Centro Centroamericano de Población, Universidad de Costa Rica, Apartado 2060, San Jose, Costa Rica
- Venue
- Demography
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2008-08-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 673-691
- ISSN
- 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-7790
- PMC
- PMC2831395
- OpenAlex
- W2132352020
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Demography (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Investigative News in Education (Universidad de Costa Rica) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Princeton University
- University of Michigan
- Wellcome Trust (072406)
- Universidad de Costa Rica
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Global Health Care Issues
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Keywords
- nonagenarians, life expectancy, oldest old, cardiovascular disease, obesity, frailty, cohort heterogeneity, sex differences in mortality, Costa Rica
- MeSH terms
- Aged, 80 and over, Cause of Death, Costa Rica, Female, Humans, Life Expectancy, Male, Mortality, Cohort Studies, Survival Analysis, Developed Countries, Censuses, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review