Cited by 466Global trade and economicsLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityHistorical Economic and Social Studies

Trade and Wages, Reconsidered

Open access
Krugman, Paul R.·2008·Brookings Papers on Economic Activity

Abstract

Standard economic analysis predicts that increased U.S. trade with unskilled labor–abundant countries should reduce the relative wages of U.S. unskilled labor, but empirical studies in the 1990s found only a modest effect. Has the situation changed in this decade, given the surge in imports from very low wage countries? In fact, most of this increase has been in skill-intensive goods such as computers, so that one would expect little additional impact on U.S. relative wages. However, developing countries appear to be specializing in unskilled labor–intensive niches within these industries. If so, the effect on wage inequality could still be significant. The paper develops a model and a numerical example showing that when developing countries can take over the unskilled labor–intensive portions of vertically specialized industries, the consequences can closely resemble the textbook effect. But determining the actual impact will require more finely disaggregated factor content data than are currently available.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/eca.0.0006

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trade integration has been a nonnegligible contributor to increased income inequality in the U.S., in many other industrialized, and even in developing countries.

    “it is by now a widely accepted view that trade integration has been a nonnegligible contributor to increased income inequality in the U.S., in many other industrialized, and even in developing countries (see Krugman, 2008, Goldberg and Pavcnik, 2007).”

    From De-Globalisation? Global Value Chains in the Post-COVID-19 Age (2020) · cites this paper as Krugman, 2008

    In “Implications of the Analysis,” Krugman says increased manufactured imports from developing countries were “probably” a force for greater inequality in the United States and other developed countries. That supports the claim’s direction for developed countries, but with more uncertainty than the citing sentence conveys. The passage does not extend the conclusion to inequality within developing countries. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Hummels, David, Jun Ishii, and Kei-Mu Yi. 2001. "The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade." Journal of International Economics 54: 75-96.
  2. Krugman, Paul R. 1980. "Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pat- tern of Trade." American Economic Review 70, no. 5: 950-59.
  3. ---. 2000. "Technology, Trade, and Factor Prices." Journal of International Economics 50, no. 1: 51-71.
  4. Leamer, Edward. 1994. "Trade, Wages, and Revolving Door Ideas." Working Paper 4716. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  5. Mishel, Lawrence, Jared Bernstein, and Sylvia Allegretto. 2006. The State of Working America 2006/2007. Cornell University Press and Economic Policy Institute.
  6. Romalis, John. 2004. "Factor Proportions and the Structure of Commodity Trade." American Economic Review 94, no. 1: 67-97.
  7. ---. 2001. "One Size Fits All? Heckscher-Ohlin Specialization in International Production." Working Paper 8244. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Eco- nomic Research.
  8. ---. 2006. "The Relative Sophistication of Chinese Exports." Working Paper 12173. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  9. Such studies include Robert Z. Lawrence, Blue-Collar Blues: Is Trade to Blame for Rising US Income Inequality? (Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2008), and Lawrence Mishel, Jared Bernstein, and Sylvia Allegretto, The State of Working America: 2006/2007 (Cornell University Press and Economics Policy Institute, 2006).
  10. Robert Koopman, Zhi Wang, and Shang-Jin Wei, "How Much of Chinese Exports Is Really Made in China? Assessing Domestic Value-Added When Processing Trade Is Perva- sive," Working Paper 14109 (Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research, June 2008).
  11. George J. Borjas, Richard B. Freeman, and Lawrence F. Katz, "How Much Do Immi- gration and Trade Affect Labor Market Outcomes?" BPEA, no. 1 (1997): 1-90;
  12. David H. Autor, Lawrence F. Katz, and Melissa S. Kearney, "Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the Revisionists," Review of Economics and Statistics 90 (May 2008): 300-23.
  13. Claudia Goldin and Lawrence F. Katz, "Long-Run Changes in the Wage Structure: Narrowing, Widening, Polarizing," BPEA, no. 2 (2007), 135-65;
  14. Goldin and Katz, The Race between Education and Technology (Harvard University Press, 2008).
  15. Robert Z. Lawrence and Matthew Slaughter, "International Trade and American Wages in the 1980s: Giant Sucking Sound or Small Hiccup?" BPEA: Microeconomics, no. 2 (1993): 161-226;
  16. David H. Autor, Lawrence F. Katz, and Alan B. Krueger, "Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed the Labor Market?" Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (November 1998): 1169-1213.
  17. George J. Borjas and Valerie A. Ramey, "Foreign Competition, Market Power, and Wage Inequality," Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (November 1995): 1075-1110.
  18. See Lawrence Mishel, Jared Bernstein, and Sylvia Allegretto, The State of Working America 2006/2007 (Cornell University Press and Economic Policy Institute, 2007), p. 145. The data used for their figure 3M are available at www.epi.org/content.cfm/datazone_ dznational.
  19. See Lawrence, Blue-Collar Blues, pp. 29 and 30.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krugman, P. R.
Venue
Brookings Papers on Economic Activity
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2008-03
Volume
2008
Issue
1
Pages
103-154
ISSN
  • 0007-2303 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4465
OpenAlex
W1968881902
Cited by
466
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 37
FWCI
77.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
Keywords
trade and wages, relative wages, unskilled labor, wage inequality, vertical specialization, developing countries, factor content of trade, trade liberalization, labor market effects of trade

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review