The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multinationals and Linkages: An Empirical Investigation
Open accessAbstract
Several recent papers have used plant-level data and panel econometric techniques to carefully explore the existence FDI externalities.One conclusion that emerges from this literature is that it is difficult to find evidence of positive externalities from multinationals to local firms in the same sector (horizontal externalities).In fact, many studies find evidence of negative horizontal externalities arising from multinational activity while confirming the existence of positive externalities from multinationals to local firms in upstream industries (vertical externalities).In this paper we explore the channels through which these positive and negative externalities may be materializing, focusing on the role of backward linkages.In particular, we criticize the common usage of the domestic sourcing coefficient as an indicator of a firm's linkage potential and propose an alternative, theoretically derived indicator.We then use plant-level data from several Latin American countries to compare multinationals' linkage potential to that of domestic firms.We find that multinational's linkage potential in Brazil, Chile and Venezuela is higher than for domestic firms.For Mexico, we cannot reject the hypothesis that foreign and local firms have similar linkage potential.Finally, we discuss the relationship between this finding and the conclusions that emerge from the recent empirical literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. M. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261725 · Cited by 17,711
Javorcik, B. S. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828041464605 · Cited by 2,950
Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and International Technology Transfer: A Survey
Saggi, K. (2002) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/17.2.191 · Cited by 732
Cited by
Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment?
Gorg, H. (2004) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/lkh019 · Cited by 1,622
Financial Globalization: A Reappraisal
Kose, M. A., Prasad, E., Rogoff, K., & Wei, S.-J. (2006) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w12484 · Cited by 927
Does foreign direct investment promote growth? Exploring the role of financial markets on linkages
Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., & Sayek, S. (2010) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.09.004 · Cited by 614
Self-citationTrade, Foreign Investment, and Industrial Policy for Developing Countries*
Harrison, A., & Rodríguez-Clare, A. (2010) · Handbook of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-52944-2.00001-x · Cited by 595
Javorcik, B. S., & Spatareanu, M. (2008) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.08.005 · Cited by 493
Metadata
- Authors
- Alfaro, L., & Rodriguez-Clare, A.
- Venue
- Economía
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-169
- ISSN
- 1529-7470 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-6239
- OpenAlex
- W2024589334
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 64.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multinationals and Linkages: An Empirical Investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/eco.2004.0012
- The paper
- Alfaro, L., & Rodriguez-Clare, A. (2004). Multinationals and Linkages: An Empirical Investigation. Economía. https://doi.org/10.1353/eco.2004.0012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.