Cited by 45Colonialism, slavery, and tradeMedieval and Early Modern JusticeHistorical Studies in Latin America

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 43 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Sentiment and the Law: Inventing the Category of the Wretched Slave in the Real Audiencia of Santo Domingo, 1783–1812

Open access
Hontanilla, Ana·2015·Eighteenth-Century Studies

Abstract

This essay explores the idea of the “pious humaneness” of the Spanish monarchy as it manifested in the legal and judicial activities of the Real Audiencia of Santo Domingo . In the 1780s, two new imperial policies relating to slavery held the potential to improve slaves’ lives. I focus on slaves’ power to denounce and correct neglect or abusive punishment in light of the new imperial policies. I reexamine social historians’ assumption that laws related to “humane” treatment were not enforced. They often were, and were several times even strengthened over masters’ objections. Slave treatment was a social order problem.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/ecs.2015.0008

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

72 No basis given · 49 Own interpretation · 33 Sources not found · 20 Own result · 10 No full text of the sources · 5 Not checked yet

Show all 88 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 67
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 45
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
101 of 101
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Real Audiencia de Santo Domingo had appellate jurisdiction over colonial Cuba, Florida, Puerto Rico, Louisiana, and Santo Domingo.

    “the superior court of appeals with jurisdiction over colonial Cuba, Florida, Puerto Rico, Louisiana, and Santo Domingo”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Diarios and Relaciones accurately and representatively record the RASD's resolutions.

    “A series of Diarios [Diaries] containing approximately 2,000 rulings of the RASD between 1785 and 1797”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 1784 Código's proposed changes largely never became law.

    “as many of the changes it proposed never became law”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The absence of recorded prosecutions for neglect indicates such prosecutions did not occur rather than being unrecorded.

    “These reports show that no masters were prosecuted for neglect.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The surviving court records and diaries accurately and representatively reflect the incidence and nature of slaves' legal claims and masters' abuses in the periods studied.

    “In short, the evidence of the diaries suggests that slaves in the city of Santo Domingo, where the RASD was located, were able to invoke the law for their benefit-yet there were far more claims for coartación [self-purchase] than there were appeals for maltreatment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The specific court cases examined are representative of broader judicial practice in the regions and periods discussed.

    “An analysis of court cases during the reform years suggests that space for slaves' agency was limited.”
6 of 6

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [3]3. First published in Italian as Riflessioni imparziali sopra l'umanità degli spagnuoli nell'Indie, contro I pretesi filosofi e politici, per servire di lume alle storie dei signori Raynal e Robertson(Venice,1780), the book was translated into Spanish twice, by Pedro Varella y Ulloa in 1782 and by the author's brother, Josef de Nuix y de Perpiñá, in 1783. For biographical details on Nuix, see Isacio Pérez Fernández, Juan Nuix y Perpinyà, S.J. frente a Bartolomé de las Casa, O.P. Dos españoles en la disputa de América de los 'ilustrado' del S. XVIII(Madrid: Institutos Pontificios, 2001), 1-7. For a critical approach to Nuix's evaluation of America's early colonization, see, Jorge Cañizares-Ezquerra, How to Write the History of the New World: Histories, Epistemologies, and Identities in the Eighteenth-Century Atlantic World (Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 2001), 35, 171, 182-86.
  2. [5]5. Darlene Clark, Hine and Jacqueline McLeod (Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press, 1999), 202-22;
  3. [15]15. María Elena Díaz, "Beyond Tannenbaum," Law and History Review 22, no. 2 (2004): 373. On the Eruopean debate regarding the sustainabitly of empire, Anthony Pagden, Lords of the World: Ideologies of Empire in Spain, Britain and France, 1500-1800 (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1995), 156-75.
  4. [20]20. Contributions by Alejandro de la Fuente, María Elena Díaz and Christopher Schmidt-Nowara, "Forum: What can Frank Tannenbaum still teach us about the Law of Slavery?," Law and History Review 22, no. 2 (2004), 339-87.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 45

Metadata

Authors
Hontanilla, A.
Corresponding author
Hontanilla, Ana
Venue
Eighteenth-Century Studies
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2015-12
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
181-200
ISSN
  • 0013-2586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1086-315X
OpenAlex
W2026079079
Cited by
45
References
22
Citations by year
2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Eighteenth-Century Studies (publishedVersion)
  • NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval and Early Modern Justice
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Latin America
Keywords
slavery, slave punishment, Spanish colonial law, colonial justice, Spanish monarchy, social order, legal enforcement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-02, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-02 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review