CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 115Medieval Literature and HistoryHistorical, Literary, and Cultural StudiesClassical Studies and Philology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cultures of Authority in the Long Twelfth Century

Open access
Ziolkowski, Jan M.·2009·JEGP, Journal of English and Germanic Philology
DOI 10.1353/egp.0.0071
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ancient and medieval usages of the Latin noun auctoritas display an intrac tability that induced one lexicographer not fifty years ago to warn bluntly against trying even to translate it:\n The word auctoritas belongs to the most significant and lasting coinages of the Latin language. Its meaning is not always easy to ascertain, and attempt ing to translate it causes even more trouble. A wise person will do better to refrain from the effort.\n To guard against such difficulties, I will not unfold a full history of auctoritas and auctores from the beginning of the Latin language down to the pres ent day. Furthermore, I will not attempt to address systematically the vast scholarship on authorship, as distinct (sometimes) from auctoritas, in the Middle Ages. Instead, I will aim mainly to sketch attitudes toward authority, and authors, that prevailed among rhetoricians, grammarians, and exegetes through the earlier Middle Ages and to offer a partial list of new stances that developed afterward. In so doing, I will train my sights on literary auctoritas and auctores, those implicated in reading and writing. Even within this re stricted ambit, I accept the impossibility of attaining exhaustive complete ness. The period I will seek eventually to elucidate may be called the long twelfth century. Centuries are arbitrary slices of time, and major transitions may refuse willfully to take place just as the ninety-ninth year yields to the hundredth. In my definition, the long twelfth cent…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/egp.0.0071

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 115

Related

Metadata

Authors
Ziolkowski, J. M.
Corresponding author
Ziolkowski, Jan M.
ORCID
Ziolkowski, Jan M.
Venue
JEGP, Journal of English and Germanic Philology
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2009
Volume
108
Issue
4
Pages
421-448
ISSN
  • 0363-6941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-662X
DOI
10.1353/egp.0.0071
OpenAlex
W2010025268
Cited by
115
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The Journal of English and Germanic Philology (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
Keywords
auctoritas, authority, authorship, Latin rhetoric, medieval exegesis, 12th century, reading and writing, Great Schism of 1054, Fourth Lateran Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review